QT Interval Evaluation in Right Ventricular Pacing: Validation of a Novel Formula

BACKGROUND: QT interval measurement in the presence of right ventricular pacing (RVP) represents a clinical challenge. We therefore aimed to derive and validate a formula for QT estimation during RVP in a large cohort of pacemaker patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients in a derivation cohort and 487 in a validation cohort. Eligible patients had implanted pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, preserved atrioventricular conduction, and a narrow native QRS. Standardized 12-lead ECGs were recorded during intrinsic rhythm, atrial pacing (AP), and RVP at matched heart rates. Linear regression of QT during non-paced rhythm against paced QT yielded the equation: QT_non-paced = 139.23 + 0.55 × QT_paced. In the validation cohort (mean age 71 ± 13 years, 72% male), application of the formula showed a significant correlation between predicted and observed QT values (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a modest mean overestimation of 15 ms, with consistent accuracy across subgroups defined by sex, device type, and lead position. Compared directly with the Bogossian method, our formula showed superior performance, with a lower mean absolute deviation (26.2 vs. 39.9). CONCLUSION: This novel, heart rate-independent formula provides a reliable method for estimating the intrinsic QT interval from paced measurements. It represents a practical tool to improve QT assessment and arrhythmic risk evaluation in patients with RVP, with potential implications for clinical decision-making and drug safety monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70239
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QT Interval Evaluation in Right Ventricular Pacing: Validation of a Novel Formula

Alhasan Almasri, Amr M. Abdin, C W Werner, Saarraaken Kulenthiran et al.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

QT Interval Evaluation in Right Ventricular Pacing: Validation of a Novel Formula

Alhasan Almasri, Amr M. Abdin, C W Werner, Saarraaken Kulenthiran, Charles R. Gieres, Christian Ukena, Yvonne Bewarder, Igor Schwantke, I Antoun, Michael Böhm
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: QT interval measurement in the presence of right ventricular pacing (RVP) represents a clinical challenge. We therefore aimed to derive and validate a formula for QT estimation during RVP in a large cohort of pacemaker patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients in a derivation cohort and 487 in a validation cohort. Eligible patients had implanted pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, preserved atrioventricular conduction, and a narrow native QRS. Standardized 12-lead ECGs were recorded during intrinsic rhythm, atrial pacing (AP), and RVP at matched heart rates. Linear regression of QT during non-paced rhythm against paced QT yielded the equation: QT_non-paced = 139.23 + 0.55 × QT_paced. In the validation cohort (mean age 71 ± 13 years, 72% male), application of the formula showed a significant correlation between predicted and observed QT values (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a modest mean overestimation of 15 ms, with consistent accuracy across subgroups defined by sex, device type, and lead position. Compared directly with the Bogossian method, our formula showed superior performance, with a lower mean absolute deviation (26.2 vs. 39.9). CONCLUSION: This novel, heart rate-independent formula provides a reliable method for estimating the intrinsic QT interval from paced measurements. It represents a practical tool to improve QT assessment and arrhythmic risk evaluation in patients with RVP, with potential implications for clinical decision-making and drug safety monitoring.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
University of Leicester (GB), Glenfield Hospital (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne (DE), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (DE), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LU), Saarland University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.