Assessment and Rehabilitation of Post-Stroke Visual Field Impairments: Current Approaches and Emerging Technologies

BackgroundVisual field defect following stroke can severely impair activities of daily living, such as visual exploration, reading, and mobility - significantly reducing quality of life. While neuroplasticity enables partial visual recovery in the first few months after stroke, the potential for recovery diminishes over time. Therefore, timely identification and treatment of visual field defects is critical.ObjectiveThis narrative review explores traditional methods and emerging technologies in visual assessment and rehabilitation. We examine traditional visual field screening methods, including static and kinetic perimetry. We also review current approaches to visual field rehabilitation, which include (1) visual substitution therapy, (2) eye movement-based therapy, and (3) visual restitution therapies such as border-field training, blindsight training, and brain stimulation. To address the limitations of current modalities, we explored technologies like wearable virtual reality headsets.ResultsVisual substitution therapies such as prisms expand the perceived visual field but are limited by adherence and side effects. Eye movement-based training improves scanning efficiency and functional performance. Visual restitution approaches, such as border-field and blindsight training, show inconsistent evidence for visual field restoration. Technologies such as virtual reality may offer more accessible and precise approaches to visual field screening and rehabilitation.ConclusionCurrent rehabilitation strategies show variable effectiveness in restoring visual fields. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683261416400
Primary Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment and Rehabilitation of Post-Stroke Visual Field Impairments: Current Approaches and Emerging Technologies

Álvaro J. Mejía-Vergara, Teng J. Peng, Daniel P. Ferris, Eric D. Ragan et al.
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
article

Assessment and Rehabilitation of Post-Stroke Visual Field Impairments: Current Approaches and Emerging Technologies

Álvaro J. Mejía-Vergara, Teng J. Peng, Daniel P. Ferris, Eric D. Ragan, Benjamin Rheault, Mahmoud Fayed
article en

Abstract

BackgroundVisual field defect following stroke can severely impair activities of daily living, such as visual exploration, reading, and mobility - significantly reducing quality of life. While neuroplasticity enables partial visual recovery in the first few months after stroke, the potential for recovery diminishes over time. Therefore, timely identification and treatment of visual field defects is critical.ObjectiveThis narrative review explores traditional methods and emerging technologies in visual assessment and rehabilitation. We examine traditional visual field screening methods, including static and kinetic perimetry. We also review current approaches to visual field rehabilitation, which include (1) visual substitution therapy, (2) eye movement-based therapy, and (3) visual restitution therapies such as border-field training, blindsight training, and brain stimulation. To address the limitations of current modalities, we explored technologies like wearable virtual reality headsets.ResultsVisual substitution therapies such as prisms expand the perceived visual field but are limited by adherence and side effects. Eye movement-based training improves scanning efficiency and functional performance. Visual restitution approaches, such as border-field and blindsight training, show inconsistent evidence for visual field restoration. Technologies such as virtual reality may offer more accessible and precise approaches to visual field screening and rehabilitation.ConclusionCurrent rehabilitation strategies show variable effectiveness in restoring visual fields. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality technologies.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repairVol. 40(5)
University of Florida (US), Florida College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.