Abstract 6913: Unbiased cell type identification and biological interpretation of spatial molecular data.

Abstract Background: While pre-defined, or biased, phenotyping algorithms are a popular approach for analyzing spatial molecular data, offering ready biological interpretation (e.g., CD8+ T-cells, CD68+PD-L1+ macrophages) and reproducibility across labs with consistent threshold choices, they suffer from subjectivity, coarseness, and an inability to capture emergent biology. Conversely, unbiased phenotyping algorithms have the potential to address these limitations, but they currently lack straightforward biological interpretability. Methods: Our SpaceIQ™ multi-omics platform performs recursive cell typing (RCT) instead of standard hierarchical clustering and other graph-based algorithms for unbiased cell identification. RCT leverages the wide dynamic range (variance) in spatial proteomics, transcriptomics, and morphology data, driven by protein abundance and other technical factors, as biologically insightful. Unlike normalized standard methods, RCT allows markers with larger variances to drive early differentiation, with smaller-variance markers defining subsequent subpopulations. Results: We demonstrate the broad applicability of RCT using the SpaceIQ™ platform across three publicly available spatial datasets, including proteomics, transcriptomics, and brightfield pathology. To facilitate biological interpretation of the resulting unbiased cell populations, RCT approach: (i) identifies discriminatory biomarker signatures for annotating each RCT; (ii) calculates the probability of pre-defined phenotypes within any unbiased cell type; and (iii) generates a minimal marker panel that can approximate any given unbiased cell type with high probability. Conclusions: Unbiased cell typing, achieved through RCT, is critical in cancer research. This approach ensures the representation of all cell states—rare, abundant, positive, negative, and transitional—regardless of antigen expression. By not relying on extensive cell-type specific training, it is uniquely suited to capture the full spectrum of cellular heterogeneity. Citation Format: Filippo Pullara, Raymond Yan, Brian Falkenstein, A. Burak Tosun, S. Chakra Chennubhotla. Unbiased cell type identification and biological interpretation of spatial molecular data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6913.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-6913
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 6913: Unbiased cell type identification and biological interpretation of spatial molecular data.

Filippo Pullara, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Brian Falkenstein, Raymond Yan et al.
Cancer Research
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Abstract 6913: Unbiased cell type identification and biological interpretation of spatial molecular data.

Filippo Pullara, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Brian Falkenstein, Raymond Yan, A. Burak Tosun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: While pre-defined, or biased, phenotyping algorithms are a popular approach for analyzing spatial molecular data, offering ready biological interpretation (e.g., CD8+ T-cells, CD68+PD-L1+ macrophages) and reproducibility across labs with consistent threshold choices, they suffer from subjectivity, coarseness, and an inability to capture emergent biology. Conversely, unbiased phenotyping algorithms have the potential to address these limitations, but they currently lack straightforward biological interpretability. Methods: Our SpaceIQ™ multi-omics platform performs recursive cell typing (RCT) instead of standard hierarchical clustering and other graph-based algorithms for unbiased cell identification. RCT leverages the wide dynamic range (variance) in spatial proteomics, transcriptomics, and morphology data, driven by protein abundance and other technical factors, as biologically insightful. Unlike normalized standard methods, RCT allows markers with larger variances to drive early differentiation, with smaller-variance markers defining subsequent subpopulations. Results: We demonstrate the broad applicability of RCT using the SpaceIQ™ platform across three publicly available spatial datasets, including proteomics, transcriptomics, and brightfield pathology. To facilitate biological interpretation of the resulting unbiased cell populations, RCT approach: (i) identifies discriminatory biomarker signatures for annotating each RCT; (ii) calculates the probability of pre-defined phenotypes within any unbiased cell type; and (iii) generates a minimal marker panel that can approximate any given unbiased cell type with high probability. Conclusions: Unbiased cell typing, achieved through RCT, is critical in cancer research. This approach ensures the representation of all cell states—rare, abundant, positive, negative, and transitional—regardless of antigen expression. By not relying on extensive cell-type specific training, it is uniquely suited to capture the full spectrum of cellular heterogeneity. Citation Format: Filippo Pullara, Raymond Yan, Brian Falkenstein, A. Burak Tosun, S. Chakra Chennubhotla. Unbiased cell type identification and biological interpretation of spatial molecular data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6913.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.