Recognizing Noncompete Agreements as Intangible Assets: A Proposal for Capitalizing a Proxy for Human Capital

SYNOPSIS Employees are becoming increasingly essential to high-performing firms in knowledge-based economies; however, their value is typically not recognized as a distinct asset in accounting. We argue that employee noncompete agreements (restraints of trade) may satisfy the definition of an intangible asset as per current standards. Using the New Zealand setting, in which companies must disclose the number of employees earning more than NZ$100,000, we estimate the value of a noncompete asset. Pro forma capitalization significantly improves the return on asset and leverage ratios and reduces the market-to-book ratio. Furthermore, these changes result in accounting numbers that better explain firm value but only for high-intangible firms and those in human capital-intensive industries. Overall, we provide evidence supporting the capitalization of a component of human capital that is likely controlled by the firm. Our research contributes to the long and contentious debate on intangible capitalization. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M41; M48; E22.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Horizons
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2025-054
Primary Topic
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing Noncompete Agreements as Intangible Assets: A Proposal for Capitalizing a Proxy for Human Capital

Nafiz Fahad, Laura Mehnaz
Accounting Horizons
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
article

Recognizing Noncompete Agreements as Intangible Assets: A Proposal for Capitalizing a Proxy for Human Capital

Nafiz Fahad, Laura Mehnaz
article en

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Employees are becoming increasingly essential to high-performing firms in knowledge-based economies; however, their value is typically not recognized as a distinct asset in accounting. We argue that employee noncompete agreements (restraints of trade) may satisfy the definition of an intangible asset as per current standards. Using the New Zealand setting, in which companies must disclose the number of employees earning more than NZ$100,000, we estimate the value of a noncompete asset. Pro forma capitalization significantly improves the return on asset and leverage ratios and reduces the market-to-book ratio. Furthermore, these changes result in accounting numbers that better explain firm value but only for high-intangible firms and those in human capital-intensive industries. Overall, we provide evidence supporting the capitalization of a component of human capital that is likely controlled by the firm. Our research contributes to the long and contentious debate on intangible capitalization. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M41; M48; E22.

Accounting Horizons
University of Auckland (NZ), Massey University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.