Abstract 1446: Accurate focal plane is crucial for AI assessment of non-monolayer urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance.

Abstract Background: Bladder cancer requires frequent surveillance, and urine cytology is widely used to guide cystoscopic evaluation. Digital image analysis aims to provide quantitative cell-level metrics aligned with The Paris System, but many laboratories use non-monolayer preparations (e.g., SurePath) that place cells in three-dimensional arrangements, complicating automated evaluation. We assessed how focal-plane selection affects nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (NC) ratio estimation and compared several algorithmic strategies for identifying the optimal focal plane. Methods: We analyzed 300 SurePath whole-slide images scanned on a Roche Ventana DP 200 system (Johns Hopkins), evenly spanning negative, atypical, suspicious, and high-grade carcinoma cases. A published detection model identified clusters, which were reannotated by six pathologists, yielding 343 clusters and 2,435 urothelial cells. Annotators outlined nuclei and cytoplasm areas at each cell’s best-focus plane. We evaluated classical focus metrics (Sum of Modified Laplacian [SML], High-Frequency Energy [HFE], Tenengrad, Brenner Gradient, Laplacian, and entropy-based OpenCV methods) and unsupervised vision-transformer approaches (feature-variance [ViT-V], attention-entropy [ViT-A], and supervised Z-stack transformer models [ViT-T, ViT-CLS] that directly predict the focal plane). Algorithms were assessed by within-1-plane accuracy relative to pathologist ground truth. NC ratios were derived from nuclear/cytoplasmic areas. U-Net segmentation generated NC ratios for a held-out test set, and Spearman correlations with ground truth were evaluated using: (1) pathologist-selected planes; (2) off-plane images; and (3) algorithm-selected planes. Results: Within-1-plane accuracy was 0.416 (ViT-A), 0.594 (Grad), 0.740 (HFE), 0.779 (OpenCV), 0.789 (ViT-V), 0.853 (Laplacian), 0.857 (Tenengrad), 0.862 (SML), and highest for Z-stack transformers ViT-T and ViT-CLS (0.874, 0.872). NC-ratio estimation at the pathologist-selected plane reached a correlation of 0.774. Correlations decreased as images moved off-plane (∼0.74 at ±1 plane; ∼0.69 at ±2; ∼0.65 at ±3; ∼0.59 at ±4; ∼0.50 at ±5). Using algorithm-selected planes, correlations were 0.639 (ViT-A), 0.687 (Grad), 0.720 (ViT-V), 0.728 (HFE), 0.733 (OpenCV), 0.743 (Tenengrad), 0.744 (Laplacian), 0.746 (SML), and 0.745/0.738 (ViT-T/ViT-CLS). Conclusion: Accurate focal-plane selection is essential for reliable AI-based cytologic assessment in non-monolayer urine preparations. NC-ratio accuracy and downstream analytic validity degraded quickly off-plane, while algorithm-selected planes recovered much of this loss. Future work will evaluate impacts on cluster- and patient-level tasks and assess extended-focus fusion methods that stitch the sharpest regions across the z-stack into a single optimally focused image. Citation Format: Brody McNutt, Sam Harvey, Minh-Khang Le, I-Chuang Liao, Keluo Yao, Xiaoying Liu, Camille Ng, Ahmad Kohsar, Daniel Shou, Christopher VandenBussche, Louis J. Vaickus, Joshua Jay Levy. Accurate focal plane is crucial for AI assessment of non-monolayer urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1446.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1446
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1446: Accurate focal plane is crucial for AI assessment of non-monolayer urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance.

Minh‐Khang Le, Christopher J. VandenBussche, Sam Harvey, Keluo Yao et al.
Cancer Research
AI in cancer detection
article

Abstract 1446: Accurate focal plane is crucial for AI assessment of non-monolayer urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance.

Minh‐Khang Le, Christopher J. VandenBussche, Sam Harvey, Keluo Yao, Ahmad Kohsar, Louis Vaickus, I-Chuang Liao, Xiaoying Liu, Camille Ng, Daniel Shou, Joshua Jay Levy, Brody McNutt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Bladder cancer requires frequent surveillance, and urine cytology is widely used to guide cystoscopic evaluation. Digital image analysis aims to provide quantitative cell-level metrics aligned with The Paris System, but many laboratories use non-monolayer preparations (e.g., SurePath) that place cells in three-dimensional arrangements, complicating automated evaluation. We assessed how focal-plane selection affects nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (NC) ratio estimation and compared several algorithmic strategies for identifying the optimal focal plane. Methods: We analyzed 300 SurePath whole-slide images scanned on a Roche Ventana DP 200 system (Johns Hopkins), evenly spanning negative, atypical, suspicious, and high-grade carcinoma cases. A published detection model identified clusters, which were reannotated by six pathologists, yielding 343 clusters and 2,435 urothelial cells. Annotators outlined nuclei and cytoplasm areas at each cell’s best-focus plane. We evaluated classical focus metrics (Sum of Modified Laplacian [SML], High-Frequency Energy [HFE], Tenengrad, Brenner Gradient, Laplacian, and entropy-based OpenCV methods) and unsupervised vision-transformer approaches (feature-variance [ViT-V], attention-entropy [ViT-A], and supervised Z-stack transformer models [ViT-T, ViT-CLS] that directly predict the focal plane). Algorithms were assessed by within-1-plane accuracy relative to pathologist ground truth. NC ratios were derived from nuclear/cytoplasmic areas. U-Net segmentation generated NC ratios for a held-out test set, and Spearman correlations with ground truth were evaluated using: (1) pathologist-selected planes; (2) off-plane images; and (3) algorithm-selected planes. Results: Within-1-plane accuracy was 0.416 (ViT-A), 0.594 (Grad), 0.740 (HFE), 0.779 (OpenCV), 0.789 (ViT-V), 0.853 (Laplacian), 0.857 (Tenengrad), 0.862 (SML), and highest for Z-stack transformers ViT-T and ViT-CLS (0.874, 0.872). NC-ratio estimation at the pathologist-selected plane reached a correlation of 0.774. Correlations decreased as images moved off-plane (∼0.74 at ±1 plane; ∼0.69 at ±2; ∼0.65 at ±3; ∼0.59 at ±4; ∼0.50 at ±5). Using algorithm-selected planes, correlations were 0.639 (ViT-A), 0.687 (Grad), 0.720 (ViT-V), 0.728 (HFE), 0.733 (OpenCV), 0.743 (Tenengrad), 0.744 (Laplacian), 0.746 (SML), and 0.745/0.738 (ViT-T/ViT-CLS). Conclusion: Accurate focal-plane selection is essential for reliable AI-based cytologic assessment in non-monolayer urine preparations. NC-ratio accuracy and downstream analytic validity degraded quickly off-plane, while algorithm-selected planes recovered much of this loss. Future work will evaluate impacts on cluster- and patient-level tasks and assess extended-focus fusion methods that stitch the sharpest regions across the z-stack into a single optimally focused image. Citation Format: Brody McNutt, Sam Harvey, Minh-Khang Le, I-Chuang Liao, Keluo Yao, Xiaoying Liu, Camille Ng, Ahmad Kohsar, Daniel Shou, Christopher VandenBussche, Louis J. Vaickus, Joshua Jay Levy. Accurate focal plane is crucial for AI assessment of non-monolayer urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1446.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.