Abstract 2729: The selective landscape of somatic mutations encodes histopathological information in breast cancer.

Abstract Cancer effect size quantifies the strength of evolutionary selection acting on somatic mutations within tumors, providing insights into which genetic alterations are being actively selected during tumor evolution. While histopathology has long been the gold standard for cancer diagnosis and classification, the relationship between evolutionary selection pressures on specific mutations and observable tumor morphology remains unexplored. We investigated whether combinations of somatic mutations, weighted by their cancer effect sizes, could serve as genomic proxies for pathological features in breast cancer. Using deep learning-based feature extraction from pre-trained histopathology models, we extracted high-dimensional morphological representations from H&E-stained whole slide images and performed cross-modal analysis to identify which mutation-selection profiles correspond to distinct histological patterns. By identifying mutation combinations whose evolutionary selection signatures associate with specific pathological features, we tested whether these genomic profiles could contribute to classifying breast cancer molecular subtypes. Our findings reveal that evolutionary selection patterns acting on specific mutation combinations show measurable correspondence with pathological features and provide contributory predictive value for subtype classification, though they do not fully recapitulate the discriminative power of histopathological assessment. This suggests that the selective landscape of somatic mutations partially encodes morphological information, with cancer effect sizes capturing aspects of the evolutionary processes that shape tumor architecture. These results provide evidence that mutation-selection profiles can complement traditional pathology and advance our understanding of how evolutionary forces influence both the genetic and morphological characteristics of breast cancer. Moreover, because cancer effect sizes capture the directionality and strength of selective pressures, their association with histopathological assessment models may improve prediction of tumor evolutionary trajectories without -omics data, offering insights into likely progression patterns with which to inform treatment strategy. Citation Format: Gift Asefon, Nic Fisk, . The selective landscape of somatic mutations encodes histopathological information in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2729.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2729
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 2729: The selective landscape of somatic mutations encodes histopathological information in breast cancer.

Nic Fisk, Gift Asefon
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 2729: The selective landscape of somatic mutations encodes histopathological information in breast cancer.

Nic Fisk, Gift Asefon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cancer effect size quantifies the strength of evolutionary selection acting on somatic mutations within tumors, providing insights into which genetic alterations are being actively selected during tumor evolution. While histopathology has long been the gold standard for cancer diagnosis and classification, the relationship between evolutionary selection pressures on specific mutations and observable tumor morphology remains unexplored. We investigated whether combinations of somatic mutations, weighted by their cancer effect sizes, could serve as genomic proxies for pathological features in breast cancer. Using deep learning-based feature extraction from pre-trained histopathology models, we extracted high-dimensional morphological representations from H&E-stained whole slide images and performed cross-modal analysis to identify which mutation-selection profiles correspond to distinct histological patterns. By identifying mutation combinations whose evolutionary selection signatures associate with specific pathological features, we tested whether these genomic profiles could contribute to classifying breast cancer molecular subtypes. Our findings reveal that evolutionary selection patterns acting on specific mutation combinations show measurable correspondence with pathological features and provide contributory predictive value for subtype classification, though they do not fully recapitulate the discriminative power of histopathological assessment. This suggests that the selective landscape of somatic mutations partially encodes morphological information, with cancer effect sizes capturing aspects of the evolutionary processes that shape tumor architecture. These results provide evidence that mutation-selection profiles can complement traditional pathology and advance our understanding of how evolutionary forces influence both the genetic and morphological characteristics of breast cancer. Moreover, because cancer effect sizes capture the directionality and strength of selective pressures, their association with histopathological assessment models may improve prediction of tumor evolutionary trajectories without -omics data, offering insights into likely progression patterns with which to inform treatment strategy. Citation Format: Gift Asefon, Nic Fisk, . The selective landscape of somatic mutations encodes histopathological information in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2729.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
University of Rhode Island (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.