Deep learning for dentomaxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography enhancement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in dentomaxillofacial imaging and radiotherapy but is limited by noise and low contrast resolution. Deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising tool for CBCT enhancement, improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated DL-based techniques for dentomaxillofacial CBCT enhancement and their impact on objective image quality metrics. METHODS: statistics. RESULTS: > 99%) limits direct comparisons. CONCLUSION: DL improves CBCT image quality, but methodological variability and limited clinical validation necessitate further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica Medica
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2026.105797
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning for dentomaxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography enhancement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anahita Najafi, Anita Taheri, Ruben Pauwels, Rata Rokhshad et al.
Physica Medica
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Deep learning for dentomaxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography enhancement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anahita Najafi, Anita Taheri, Ruben Pauwels, Rata Rokhshad, Ghazal Hemmati, Soroush Sadr, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi, Falk Schwendicke
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in dentomaxillofacial imaging and radiotherapy but is limited by noise and low contrast resolution. Deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising tool for CBCT enhancement, improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated DL-based techniques for dentomaxillofacial CBCT enhancement and their impact on objective image quality metrics. METHODS: statistics. RESULTS: > 99%) limits direct comparisons. CONCLUSION: DL improves CBCT image quality, but methodological variability and limited clinical validation necessitate further research.

Physica MedicaVol. 145
Aarhus University (DK), Loma Linda University (US), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), LMU Klinikum (DE), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.