Abstract 1243: Cancer survivors’ acceptance of technology-based tools for stress management and effective communication.

Abstract Cancer survivors process complex diagnosis and treatment information making medical appointments a source of stress. Uncertainty about medical decisions heightens stress limiting quality of communication during appointments. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are emerging as approaches to enhance patient support yet use with Spanish-speaking cancer survivors is limited. This study sought to characterize stress levels of Puerto Rican cancer survivors and assess preparedness before meeting with physicians. We also assessed openness to use technology for stress management and communication with physicians. We hypothesized survivors would report high stress levels, low preparedness, and acceptance of technology. In this cross-sectional study, 169 cancer survivors aged ≥21 were recruited prior to their appointment in oncology waiting rooms. Upon consenting, they completed a survey to assess stress, preparedness, and openness to technology. Stress levels in the past 30 days, prior to appointments, and regarding the current visit were measured. Preparedness for the visit was assessed with a 1-10 scale and asking if they had prepared a list of questions for their physicians. Openness to technology was assessed with questions about willingness to: use a phone/tablet for a relaxation exercise and submit questions electronically for physicians to read before appointments. Statistical analyses were performed using R. Descriptive statistics were used to assess variables of interest. Most study participants (68.6%) were women; mean age 57.8 (SD=14.5). Average age at cancer diagnosis was 55 (SD=14.7). Reasons for visit included routine follow-up (61.7%), test results discussion (9%), first appointment (9%), and follow-up for new symptoms (4.2%). More than a third (36.3%) reported usually/always feeling stress in the past 30 days, 55.6% reported stress prior to appointments, and 53% about their current visit. Despite an average self-reported preparation score of 8.4 (out of 10) and 92% indicating they felt prepared for the visit, only 27% had written a list of questions to guide the conversation with their physician. As for acceptance to technology-based tools, 68% indicated they would benefit from a stress management exercise before appointments and 66% were willing to send questions electronically to their physicians. Among those unwilling, the most common reason was preference for in-person discussion (27.2%). Stress may impair memory interfering with survivors’ intentions to ask questions during visits. Findings confirm high pre-appointment stress among cancer survivors and a low tendency to write questions to aid communication. This highlights a need for strategies to enhance emotional readiness and preparedness. Results suggest openness to AI-assisted tools for stress management and improved patient-physician communication, supporting its integration into standard cancer care. Citation Format: Ana C. Sala, Liliana Castro Jimenez, Brenda Torres, Zaydelis Tamarit, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Vivian Colón-López. Cancer survivors’ acceptance of technology-based tools for stress management and effective communication [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1243.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1243
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1243: Cancer survivors’ acceptance of technology-based tools for stress management and effective communication.

Ana Cecilia Sala, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Zaydelis Tamarit, Brenda Torres et al.
Cancer Research
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 1243: Cancer survivors’ acceptance of technology-based tools for stress management and effective communication.

Ana Cecilia Sala, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Zaydelis Tamarit, Brenda Torres, Liliana Castro Jimenez, Vivian Colón-López
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cancer survivors process complex diagnosis and treatment information making medical appointments a source of stress. Uncertainty about medical decisions heightens stress limiting quality of communication during appointments. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are emerging as approaches to enhance patient support yet use with Spanish-speaking cancer survivors is limited. This study sought to characterize stress levels of Puerto Rican cancer survivors and assess preparedness before meeting with physicians. We also assessed openness to use technology for stress management and communication with physicians. We hypothesized survivors would report high stress levels, low preparedness, and acceptance of technology. In this cross-sectional study, 169 cancer survivors aged ≥21 were recruited prior to their appointment in oncology waiting rooms. Upon consenting, they completed a survey to assess stress, preparedness, and openness to technology. Stress levels in the past 30 days, prior to appointments, and regarding the current visit were measured. Preparedness for the visit was assessed with a 1-10 scale and asking if they had prepared a list of questions for their physicians. Openness to technology was assessed with questions about willingness to: use a phone/tablet for a relaxation exercise and submit questions electronically for physicians to read before appointments. Statistical analyses were performed using R. Descriptive statistics were used to assess variables of interest. Most study participants (68.6%) were women; mean age 57.8 (SD=14.5). Average age at cancer diagnosis was 55 (SD=14.7). Reasons for visit included routine follow-up (61.7%), test results discussion (9%), first appointment (9%), and follow-up for new symptoms (4.2%). More than a third (36.3%) reported usually/always feeling stress in the past 30 days, 55.6% reported stress prior to appointments, and 53% about their current visit. Despite an average self-reported preparation score of 8.4 (out of 10) and 92% indicating they felt prepared for the visit, only 27% had written a list of questions to guide the conversation with their physician. As for acceptance to technology-based tools, 68% indicated they would benefit from a stress management exercise before appointments and 66% were willing to send questions electronically to their physicians. Among those unwilling, the most common reason was preference for in-person discussion (27.2%). Stress may impair memory interfering with survivors’ intentions to ask questions during visits. Findings confirm high pre-appointment stress among cancer survivors and a low tendency to write questions to aid communication. This highlights a need for strategies to enhance emotional readiness and preparedness. Results suggest openness to AI-assisted tools for stress management and improved patient-physician communication, supporting its integration into standard cancer care. Citation Format: Ana C. Sala, Liliana Castro Jimenez, Brenda Torres, Zaydelis Tamarit, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Vivian Colón-López. Cancer survivors’ acceptance of technology-based tools for stress management and effective communication [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1243.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
University of Puerto Rico System (PR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.