Assessing Social Drivers of Health Among Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Patients Using Psychosocial Screening: Rates of Risk and What DO we <scp>DO</scp> ?

BACKGROUND: Disparities in pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) outcomes persist despite increasing awareness. Efforts to reduce such disparities may include increasing screening to identify and mitigate social drivers of health (SDOH); however, research is needed to understand current clinical screening efforts and their impacts on referral outcomes. METHODS: Caregivers (N = 302) of pediatric patients (0-20 years) completed the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT 2.0) during annual multidisciplinary transplant clinic visits to identify SDOH and psychosocial risk. Total PAT scores were categorized into Universal, Targeted, or Clinical psychosocial risk ranges. Descriptive data from medical charts and PAT responses were analyzed to evaluate referral patterns, follow-up rates, and adverse SDOH prevalence. RESULTS: The majority of PAT scores were within the Universal risk range (65%), with heart transplant families reporting significantly higher psychosocial risk levels compared to liver and kidney (F(2, 298) = 5.22, p = 0.006). Most families (83%) identified at least one potentially adverse SDOH. Those screening Targeted or Clinical reported significantly greater average number of SDOH risk factors compared to Universal range (F(2, 299) = 38.75, p < 0.001). One year post-screening, the majority of families in the Targeted or Clinical risk range completed follow-up with at least one psychosocial service, including social work (86%), mental/behavioral health providers (41%), and educational specialist interventions (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated rates of psychosocial risk in pediatric SOT continue to persist; therefore, standardized clinical assessments to identify potentially adverse SDOH or healthcare barriers are necessary to provide individualized support. Implementing routine screening with appropriate referrals is a crucial step in addressing SDOH disparities throughout the transplant process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Transplantation
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.70311
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Social Drivers of Health Among Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Patients Using Psychosocial Screening: Rates of Risk and What DO we DO ?

Sriram Swaminathan, Melissa K. Cousino, Emily M. Fredericks, Kelly E. Rea et al.
Pediatric Transplantation
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Assessing Social Drivers of Health Among Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Patients Using Psychosocial Screening: Rates of Risk and What DO we DO ?

Sriram Swaminathan, Melissa K. Cousino, Emily M. Fredericks, Kelly E. Rea, Catherine R. Dusing, Kathleen G. Fredericks
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparities in pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) outcomes persist despite increasing awareness. Efforts to reduce such disparities may include increasing screening to identify and mitigate social drivers of health (SDOH); however, research is needed to understand current clinical screening efforts and their impacts on referral outcomes. METHODS: Caregivers (N = 302) of pediatric patients (0-20 years) completed the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT 2.0) during annual multidisciplinary transplant clinic visits to identify SDOH and psychosocial risk. Total PAT scores were categorized into Universal, Targeted, or Clinical psychosocial risk ranges. Descriptive data from medical charts and PAT responses were analyzed to evaluate referral patterns, follow-up rates, and adverse SDOH prevalence. RESULTS: The majority of PAT scores were within the Universal risk range (65%), with heart transplant families reporting significantly higher psychosocial risk levels compared to liver and kidney (F(2, 298) = 5.22, p = 0.006). Most families (83%) identified at least one potentially adverse SDOH. Those screening Targeted or Clinical reported significantly greater average number of SDOH risk factors compared to Universal range (F(2, 299) = 38.75, p < 0.001). One year post-screening, the majority of families in the Targeted or Clinical risk range completed follow-up with at least one psychosocial service, including social work (86%), mental/behavioral health providers (41%), and educational specialist interventions (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated rates of psychosocial risk in pediatric SOT continue to persist; therefore, standardized clinical assessments to identify potentially adverse SDOH or healthcare barriers are necessary to provide individualized support. Implementing routine screening with appropriate referrals is a crucial step in addressing SDOH disparities throughout the transplant process.

Pediatric TransplantationVol. 30(4)
C. S. Mott Children's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.