Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplant: Approaches to Screening and Treatment—A National Survey of Canadian Nephrologists

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that up to half of kidney-transplant (KT) recipients develop asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) within three years posttransplantation. Despite limited evidence supporting screening or treatment, most centers continue routine surveillance and antibiotic therapy, raising concerns about antimicrobial resistance, drug toxicity, and costs. We sought to describe current Canadian practices and perceptions regarding ASB screening and treatment among nephrologists caring for KT recipients. METHODS: Nationwide cross-sectional survey. All nephrologists affiliated with the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) Kidney Group were invited to complete a 27-item electronic survey assessing demographic characteristics, ASB screening and treatment practices, and attitudes toward future clinical trials. RESULTS: Thirty-five nephrologists responded (66% response rate, 35/53) from 12 of 18 adult KT centers in Canada (67% national center representation). Forty percent (14/35) were aged 45-54 years; 49% (17/35) were women; and 57% (20/35) had >15 years of transplant experience. Most (28/35, 80%) reported screening for ASB during the first 2 months posttransplant, most often with weekly urine cultures (20/35, 57%; 19/35, 54%), typically until stent removal (21/35, 61%). All respondents (35/35, 100%) treated ASB during this period, most commonly for 7 days (19/35, 54%); 4/35 (11%) ordered additional investigations. After stent removal, only 7/35 (20%) continued screening and 2/35 (6%) continued treatment. Overall, 14/35 (40%) would modify practice if stronger evidence became available, and 31/35 (88%) were willing to participate in a randomized trial withholding antibiotics for ASB. CONCLUSION: Significant variability exists in ASB screening and treatment practices among Canadian nephrologists. These findings highlight a true evidence gap regarding management during the early posttransplant period, rather than a failure to adopt established data, and support the need for pragmatic clinical trials to guide evidence-based ASB management and antimicrobial stewardship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Transplantation
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70529
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplant: Approaches to Screening and Treatment—A National Survey of Canadian Nephrologists

Victoria Hall, S. Joseph Kim, Sonia Rodriguez‐Ramirez, Shahid Husain
Clinical Transplantation
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplant: Approaches to Screening and Treatment—A National Survey of Canadian Nephrologists

Victoria Hall, S. Joseph Kim, Sonia Rodriguez‐Ramirez, Shahid Husain
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that up to half of kidney-transplant (KT) recipients develop asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) within three years posttransplantation. Despite limited evidence supporting screening or treatment, most centers continue routine surveillance and antibiotic therapy, raising concerns about antimicrobial resistance, drug toxicity, and costs. We sought to describe current Canadian practices and perceptions regarding ASB screening and treatment among nephrologists caring for KT recipients. METHODS: Nationwide cross-sectional survey. All nephrologists affiliated with the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) Kidney Group were invited to complete a 27-item electronic survey assessing demographic characteristics, ASB screening and treatment practices, and attitudes toward future clinical trials. RESULTS: Thirty-five nephrologists responded (66% response rate, 35/53) from 12 of 18 adult KT centers in Canada (67% national center representation). Forty percent (14/35) were aged 45-54 years; 49% (17/35) were women; and 57% (20/35) had >15 years of transplant experience. Most (28/35, 80%) reported screening for ASB during the first 2 months posttransplant, most often with weekly urine cultures (20/35, 57%; 19/35, 54%), typically until stent removal (21/35, 61%). All respondents (35/35, 100%) treated ASB during this period, most commonly for 7 days (19/35, 54%); 4/35 (11%) ordered additional investigations. After stent removal, only 7/35 (20%) continued screening and 2/35 (6%) continued treatment. Overall, 14/35 (40%) would modify practice if stronger evidence became available, and 31/35 (88%) were willing to participate in a randomized trial withholding antibiotics for ASB. CONCLUSION: Significant variability exists in ASB screening and treatment practices among Canadian nephrologists. These findings highlight a true evidence gap regarding management during the early posttransplant period, rather than a failure to adopt established data, and support the need for pragmatic clinical trials to guide evidence-based ASB management and antimicrobial stewardship.

Clinical TransplantationVol. 40(4)
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.