Abstract 2603: Comparing methylation signatures across 15 cancer types and 7 subtypes

Abstract Differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the regions that have a different methylation pattern between tumor and non-tumor genomes, can serve as accurate biomarkers for cancer detection. Here we compare DMRs across 15 cancer types and 7 cancer subtypes. In this retrospective study, tissue samples from 832 patients with 15 different cancer types, including gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), gynecological, breast, lung, melanoma, and head & neck cancers, were analyzed to measure methylation levels across genomic regions. Advanced adenoma (AA), an important precursor to colorectal cancer, was also included as a comparator among GI indications. Sets of DMRs were identified in each cancer type based on comparison with methylation levels of healthy samples. DMR signatures were compared across cancer types and subtypes by calculating pairwise overlaps. Across all 15 cancer types, the overlap of shared DMRs ranged from 13% (melanoma vs gastric cancer) to 61% (esophageal cancer vs gastric cancer). Notably, we found strong overlap among GI indications, a group including esophageal, gastric, small intestine, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer, as well as AA. Compared to non-GI cancers, the pairwise overlap of DMRs in GI indications was, on average, 17% higher. Moreover, 65% of DMRs were shared between AA and colorectal cancer, which represented the highest overlap of shared DMRs in any pairwise comparison in this analysis. Among breast and lung cancer samples, we compared subtypes and found strong, but variable, overlap. For instance, among four major subtypes of breast cancer, we found overlaps ranging 53%-68% between subtypes. Among three lung cancer subtypes, overlaps ranged from 34% to 44%. In this study, we demonstrate that each cancer’s DMR signature is ultimately unique and can be used as a biomarker for cancer detection even though there is some overlap between DMR signatures of different cancer types. A deeper study of the shared and unique DMR signatures may provide insights into underlying biological mechanisms of cancer development. For example, the high overlap of DMR signatures among GI cancers suggests some shared mechanisms; similarly, while DMR signatures are expected to be similar between subtypes of a cancer, investigation into the patterns unique to each subtype may help resolve observed differences in clinical prognosis and treatment response. Citation Format: Harry Mickalide, Joel Rodriguez-Medina, Fernando L. Mendez, Murat Can Cobanoglu, Scott Dashner, Yuqian Jiang, Kevin Chan, Joshua N. Burton, Trupti Kawli, Johannes G. Reiter, Matthew Rabinowitz, Alexey Aleshin. Comparing methylation signatures across 15 cancer types and 7 subtypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2603.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2603
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 2603: Comparing methylation signatures across 15 cancer types and 7 subtypes

Trupti Kawli, Joshua N. Burton, Yuqian Jiang, Joel Rodríguez-Medina et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 2603: Comparing methylation signatures across 15 cancer types and 7 subtypes

Trupti Kawli, Joshua N. Burton, Yuqian Jiang, Joel Rodríguez-Medina, Harry Mickalide, Matt Rabinowitz, Murat Can Çobanoğlu, Fernando L. Méndez, Scott Dashner, Johannes G. Reiter, Kevin Chan, Alexey Aleshin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the regions that have a different methylation pattern between tumor and non-tumor genomes, can serve as accurate biomarkers for cancer detection. Here we compare DMRs across 15 cancer types and 7 cancer subtypes. In this retrospective study, tissue samples from 832 patients with 15 different cancer types, including gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), gynecological, breast, lung, melanoma, and head & neck cancers, were analyzed to measure methylation levels across genomic regions. Advanced adenoma (AA), an important precursor to colorectal cancer, was also included as a comparator among GI indications. Sets of DMRs were identified in each cancer type based on comparison with methylation levels of healthy samples. DMR signatures were compared across cancer types and subtypes by calculating pairwise overlaps. Across all 15 cancer types, the overlap of shared DMRs ranged from 13% (melanoma vs gastric cancer) to 61% (esophageal cancer vs gastric cancer). Notably, we found strong overlap among GI indications, a group including esophageal, gastric, small intestine, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer, as well as AA. Compared to non-GI cancers, the pairwise overlap of DMRs in GI indications was, on average, 17% higher. Moreover, 65% of DMRs were shared between AA and colorectal cancer, which represented the highest overlap of shared DMRs in any pairwise comparison in this analysis. Among breast and lung cancer samples, we compared subtypes and found strong, but variable, overlap. For instance, among four major subtypes of breast cancer, we found overlaps ranging 53%-68% between subtypes. Among three lung cancer subtypes, overlaps ranged from 34% to 44%. In this study, we demonstrate that each cancer’s DMR signature is ultimately unique and can be used as a biomarker for cancer detection even though there is some overlap between DMR signatures of different cancer types. A deeper study of the shared and unique DMR signatures may provide insights into underlying biological mechanisms of cancer development. For example, the high overlap of DMR signatures among GI cancers suggests some shared mechanisms; similarly, while DMR signatures are expected to be similar between subtypes of a cancer, investigation into the patterns unique to each subtype may help resolve observed differences in clinical prognosis and treatment response. Citation Format: Harry Mickalide, Joel Rodriguez-Medina, Fernando L. Mendez, Murat Can Cobanoglu, Scott Dashner, Yuqian Jiang, Kevin Chan, Joshua N. Burton, Trupti Kawli, Johannes G. Reiter, Matthew Rabinowitz, Alexey Aleshin. Comparing methylation signatures across 15 cancer types and 7 subtypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2603.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Natera (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.