Abstract 7773: Continuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved survival outcomes in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, disease progression after first-line ICI therapy remains a major clinical challenge, and the benefit of ICI continuation or rechallenge after progression has not been fully elucidated. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we included patients diagnosed with HNSCC between 2016 and May 2025 at Samsung Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital. This study included patients who received first-line ICI therapy with or without other agents. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who received second-line ICI continuation (ICI-based regimens) and those who received non-ICI treatments. Results: A total of 278 patients received first-line ICI therapy with or without chemotherapy, including 85 (30.6%) with HPV-positive HNSCC, 133 (47.8%) with HPV-negative disease, and 60 (21.6%) with unknown HPV status. Among them, 242 patients (87.0%) experienced disease progression after first-line ICI ± chemotherapy, and 210 proceeded to second-line treatment. Of these 210 patients, 73(34.8%) received ICI-based therapy— while the remaining 137 (65.2%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy or other non-ICI regimens. The median OS from the start of first-line therapy was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.5-19.5). Median OS was 21.1 months for patients who received second-line ICI continuation and 14.3 months for those who received non-ICI treatments (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85, P = 0.004). The median OS from the start of second-line therapy was 12.2 months for patients who received ICI with or without other agents and 8.0 months for those who received chemotherapy (P = 0.003). In subgroup analyses stratified by first-line ICI efficacy, patients with a first-line treatment duration of < 6 months showed a modest OS advantage with ICI-based second-line therapy compared with non-ICI regimens (11.2 vs. 8.0 months; P = 0.042). In patients whose first-line treatment duration was ≥ 6 months, the difference was substantially more pronounced, with ICI-based therapy demonstrating a markedly longer OS compared with non-ICI treatment (12.7 vs. 7.8 months; P = 0.035). Conclusions: ICI continuation was associated with a significant OS benefit compared with non-ICI regimens in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who progressed after first-line ICIs. These findings indicate that continuing ICI-based treatment may be a feasible option regardless of the duration of first-line PFS, with a more pronounced benefit in patients who initially achieved durable disease control with first-line ICI therapy. Citation Format: Hyun Ae Jung, Young Kim, Ross Merkin, Thomas Roberts, Manisha Patel, Boram Park, Jinyong Kim, Sehhoon Park, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Lori J. Wirth, Jong Chul Park. Continuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7773.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-7773
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 7773: Continuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Boram Park, Lori J. Wirth, Manisha J. Patel, Ross D. Merkin et al.
Cancer Research
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Abstract 7773: Continuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study

Boram Park, Lori J. Wirth, Manisha J. Patel, Ross D. Merkin, Young R. Kim, Sehhoon Park, Hyun Ae Jung, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jin Seok Ahn, Se-Hoon Lee, Thomas Roberts, Jinyong Kim, Jong-Mu Sun, Jong Chul Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved survival outcomes in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, disease progression after first-line ICI therapy remains a major clinical challenge, and the benefit of ICI continuation or rechallenge after progression has not been fully elucidated. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we included patients diagnosed with HNSCC between 2016 and May 2025 at Samsung Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital. This study included patients who received first-line ICI therapy with or without other agents. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who received second-line ICI continuation (ICI-based regimens) and those who received non-ICI treatments. Results: A total of 278 patients received first-line ICI therapy with or without chemotherapy, including 85 (30.6%) with HPV-positive HNSCC, 133 (47.8%) with HPV-negative disease, and 60 (21.6%) with unknown HPV status. Among them, 242 patients (87.0%) experienced disease progression after first-line ICI ± chemotherapy, and 210 proceeded to second-line treatment. Of these 210 patients, 73(34.8%) received ICI-based therapy— while the remaining 137 (65.2%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy or other non-ICI regimens. The median OS from the start of first-line therapy was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.5-19.5). Median OS was 21.1 months for patients who received second-line ICI continuation and 14.3 months for those who received non-ICI treatments (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85, P = 0.004). The median OS from the start of second-line therapy was 12.2 months for patients who received ICI with or without other agents and 8.0 months for those who received chemotherapy (P = 0.003). In subgroup analyses stratified by first-line ICI efficacy, patients with a first-line treatment duration of < 6 months showed a modest OS advantage with ICI-based second-line therapy compared with non-ICI regimens (11.2 vs. 8.0 months; P = 0.042). In patients whose first-line treatment duration was ≥ 6 months, the difference was substantially more pronounced, with ICI-based therapy demonstrating a markedly longer OS compared with non-ICI treatment (12.7 vs. 7.8 months; P = 0.035). Conclusions: ICI continuation was associated with a significant OS benefit compared with non-ICI regimens in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who progressed after first-line ICIs. These findings indicate that continuing ICI-based treatment may be a feasible option regardless of the duration of first-line PFS, with a more pronounced benefit in patients who initially achieved durable disease control with first-line ICI therapy. Citation Format: Hyun Ae Jung, Young Kim, Ross Merkin, Thomas Roberts, Manisha Patel, Boram Park, Jinyong Kim, Sehhoon Park, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Lori J. Wirth, Jong Chul Park. Continuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7773.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
New York Medical College (US), Inha University (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.