Abstract 2716: Machine learning-based screening tool for multiple myeloma detection in chronic kidney disease patients with limited laboratory testing.

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) share similar clinical manifestations including renal impairment and anemia, making MM diagnosis challenging in general and nephrology clinics. Many CKD patients harbor undiagnosed MM, but healthcare insurance restrictions and public health system constraints limit ordering of specialized tests (serum protein electrophoresis, free light chains, immunoglobulins). This diagnostic delay can result in irreversible renal damage and delayed treatment. We developed a machine learning model using routine laboratory parameters to identify CKD patients requiring MM-specific workup or hematology referral. Methods: We analyzed 4,759 CKD patients (591 MM, 4,168 non-MM controls; 12.4% prevalence) from a tertiary center. Using only routine tests available in general practice, we engineered features including CBC (hemoglobin, WBC, platelets), biochemistry (total protein, albumin, calcium, LDH, creatinine), and urine studies (protein, albumin, creatinine). Three feature sets were tested: RANK1 (20 features), RANK2 (16 features), and RANK3 (4 minimal features). We compared XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. with both unbalanced and SMOTEENN-resampled data. Results: XGBoost achieved optimal performance: accuracy 95.1%, F1-score 0.798, ROC-AUC 0.962, PR-AUC 0.889. The minimal 4-feature model (platelet, WBC, urine protein, LDH) maintained clinically useful performance (F1 0.596, PR-AUC 0.627). SHAP analysis revealed hemoglobin/WBC ratio, platelet count, albumin/total protein ratio, and total protein as top predictors, capturing MM's characteristic hematologic suppression and paraproteinemia without requiring specialized assays. Dimensionality reduction visualization (PCA, UMAP, t-SNE) demonstrated distinct clustering patterns between MM and non-MM CKD patients, confirming inherent feature space separability despite overlapping clinical presentations. Conclusions: This ML-based screening tool demonstrates potential for identifying high-risk CKD patients warranting MM-specific testing using only routine laboratory data. However, this retrospective single-center study has limitations including potential selection bias and lack of external validation. Prospective multicenter validation studies are needed to assess real-world clinical utility, optimal decision thresholds, and impact on diagnostic timeliness before implementation in clinical practice. Citation Format: Wen-Chi Wu, Muh-Hwa Yang, Chih-Yu Yang, . Machine learning-based screening tool for multiple myeloma detection in chronic kidney disease patients with limited laboratory testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2716.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2716
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 2716: Machine learning-based screening tool for multiple myeloma detection in chronic kidney disease patients with limited laboratory testing.

Wen‐Chi Vivian Wu, Muh-Hwa Yang, Chih-Yu Yang
Cancer Research
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Abstract 2716: Machine learning-based screening tool for multiple myeloma detection in chronic kidney disease patients with limited laboratory testing.

Wen‐Chi Vivian Wu, Muh-Hwa Yang, Chih-Yu Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) share similar clinical manifestations including renal impairment and anemia, making MM diagnosis challenging in general and nephrology clinics. Many CKD patients harbor undiagnosed MM, but healthcare insurance restrictions and public health system constraints limit ordering of specialized tests (serum protein electrophoresis, free light chains, immunoglobulins). This diagnostic delay can result in irreversible renal damage and delayed treatment. We developed a machine learning model using routine laboratory parameters to identify CKD patients requiring MM-specific workup or hematology referral. Methods: We analyzed 4,759 CKD patients (591 MM, 4,168 non-MM controls; 12.4% prevalence) from a tertiary center. Using only routine tests available in general practice, we engineered features including CBC (hemoglobin, WBC, platelets), biochemistry (total protein, albumin, calcium, LDH, creatinine), and urine studies (protein, albumin, creatinine). Three feature sets were tested: RANK1 (20 features), RANK2 (16 features), and RANK3 (4 minimal features). We compared XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. with both unbalanced and SMOTEENN-resampled data. Results: XGBoost achieved optimal performance: accuracy 95.1%, F1-score 0.798, ROC-AUC 0.962, PR-AUC 0.889. The minimal 4-feature model (platelet, WBC, urine protein, LDH) maintained clinically useful performance (F1 0.596, PR-AUC 0.627). SHAP analysis revealed hemoglobin/WBC ratio, platelet count, albumin/total protein ratio, and total protein as top predictors, capturing MM's characteristic hematologic suppression and paraproteinemia without requiring specialized assays. Dimensionality reduction visualization (PCA, UMAP, t-SNE) demonstrated distinct clustering patterns between MM and non-MM CKD patients, confirming inherent feature space separability despite overlapping clinical presentations. Conclusions: This ML-based screening tool demonstrates potential for identifying high-risk CKD patients warranting MM-specific testing using only routine laboratory data. However, this retrospective single-center study has limitations including potential selection bias and lack of external validation. Prospective multicenter validation studies are needed to assess real-world clinical utility, optimal decision thresholds, and impact on diagnostic timeliness before implementation in clinical practice. Citation Format: Wen-Chi Wu, Muh-Hwa Yang, Chih-Yu Yang, . Machine learning-based screening tool for multiple myeloma detection in chronic kidney disease patients with limited laboratory testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2716.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.