Abstract 5266: FLASH radiotherapy maintains tumor control and enables safe re-irradiation while preserving normal tissue in breast cancer PDX models

Abstract Background: Radiotherapy is central to breast cancer treatment but is limited by acute and cumulative skin toxicity, especially in large-field treatments and re-irradiation. Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT, ≥ 40 Gy/s) may widen the therapeutic window by reducing normal-tissue injury without compromising tumor control. However, breast-directed and patient-derived models remain underexplored, including the effects of FLASH under repeated-irradiation conditions. Methods: We integrated an orthotopic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model and hemithoracic normal-tissue models to compare FLASH-RT (180 Gy/s) with CONV-RT (0.03 Gy/s). TNBC-bearing NRG mice received single-fraction of 30Gy electron irradiation via a custom stereotactic jig enabling mammary-targeted or hemithoracic fields. A separate cohort of non-tumor-bearing NRG mice underwent left-chest re-irradiation to assess cumulative tolerance. Endpoints included tumor regression, recurrence, survival, and graded skin toxicity; ongoing analyses incorporate histopathology and single-cell/spatial transcriptomics to elucidate FLASH-mediated tissue responses and mechanisms of normal-tissue sparing. Results: FLASH-RT achieved equivalent tumor control to CONV-RT in TNBC-PDX models, with both modalities inducing complete regression by day 16 and maintaining clearance for two weeks before recurrence at day 32 post-RT. In contrast, normal-tissue responses diverged markedly: FLASH-RT significantly reduced acute skin toxicity (median score 0 vs. 5; p<0.0001), eliminated ulceration, and extended survival (120 vs. 90 days post-implantation) in tumor bearing mice. In non-tumor-bearing NRG mice, FLASH-RT also improved tolerance to cumulative thoracic irradiation; mice receiving a second 25Gy left-chest FLASH irradiation dose showed no clinical decline, whereas CONV-RT animals developed progressive toxicity requiring euthanasia within three months of re-irradiation. Multi-omics analyses are underway to define mechanisms of early tissue sparing and improved re-irradiation response. Conclusions: FLASH-RT maintains tumor-control efficacy equivalent to CONV-RT while significantly reducing skin toxicity in TNBC-PDX models and improving normal-tissue tolerance to re-irradiation in non-tumor-bearing NRG mice. These findings support FLASH-RT as a clinically promising strategy that may expand safe re-treatment options and broaden curative radiotherapy opportunities in breast cancer. Mechanistic studies are ongoing to elucidate the biological basis of early tissue sparing and guide translation into breast-conserving and post-mastectomy treatment settings. Citation Format: Adel Zaid I Mutahar, Banita Verma, Stavros Melemenidis, Suparna Dutt, Kerriann M. Casey, Zhen Qi, Angera Hsiao-Chi Kuo, Kathleen C. Horst, Edward Elliot Graves, Michael F. Clarke, Billy W. Loo, Frederick M. Dirbas. FLASH radiotherapy maintains tumor control and enables safe re-irradiation while preserving normal tissue in breast cancer PDX models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5266.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-5266
Primary Topic
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 5266: FLASH radiotherapy maintains tumor control and enables safe re-irradiation while preserving normal tissue in breast cancer PDX models

Suparna Dutt, Billy W. Loo, Frederick M. Dirbas, Stavros Melemenidis et al.
Cancer Research
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
article

Abstract 5266: FLASH radiotherapy maintains tumor control and enables safe re-irradiation while preserving normal tissue in breast cancer PDX models

Suparna Dutt, Billy W. Loo, Frederick M. Dirbas, Stavros Melemenidis, Kathleen C. Horst, Kerriann M. Casey, Michael F. Clarke, Adel Z. I. Mutahar, Edward E. Graves, Zhen Qi, B. Verma, Angera Hsiao-Chi Kuo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Radiotherapy is central to breast cancer treatment but is limited by acute and cumulative skin toxicity, especially in large-field treatments and re-irradiation. Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT, ≥ 40 Gy/s) may widen the therapeutic window by reducing normal-tissue injury without compromising tumor control. However, breast-directed and patient-derived models remain underexplored, including the effects of FLASH under repeated-irradiation conditions. Methods: We integrated an orthotopic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model and hemithoracic normal-tissue models to compare FLASH-RT (180 Gy/s) with CONV-RT (0.03 Gy/s). TNBC-bearing NRG mice received single-fraction of 30Gy electron irradiation via a custom stereotactic jig enabling mammary-targeted or hemithoracic fields. A separate cohort of non-tumor-bearing NRG mice underwent left-chest re-irradiation to assess cumulative tolerance. Endpoints included tumor regression, recurrence, survival, and graded skin toxicity; ongoing analyses incorporate histopathology and single-cell/spatial transcriptomics to elucidate FLASH-mediated tissue responses and mechanisms of normal-tissue sparing. Results: FLASH-RT achieved equivalent tumor control to CONV-RT in TNBC-PDX models, with both modalities inducing complete regression by day 16 and maintaining clearance for two weeks before recurrence at day 32 post-RT. In contrast, normal-tissue responses diverged markedly: FLASH-RT significantly reduced acute skin toxicity (median score 0 vs. 5; p<0.0001), eliminated ulceration, and extended survival (120 vs. 90 days post-implantation) in tumor bearing mice. In non-tumor-bearing NRG mice, FLASH-RT also improved tolerance to cumulative thoracic irradiation; mice receiving a second 25Gy left-chest FLASH irradiation dose showed no clinical decline, whereas CONV-RT animals developed progressive toxicity requiring euthanasia within three months of re-irradiation. Multi-omics analyses are underway to define mechanisms of early tissue sparing and improved re-irradiation response. Conclusions: FLASH-RT maintains tumor-control efficacy equivalent to CONV-RT while significantly reducing skin toxicity in TNBC-PDX models and improving normal-tissue tolerance to re-irradiation in non-tumor-bearing NRG mice. These findings support FLASH-RT as a clinically promising strategy that may expand safe re-treatment options and broaden curative radiotherapy opportunities in breast cancer. Mechanistic studies are ongoing to elucidate the biological basis of early tissue sparing and guide translation into breast-conserving and post-mastectomy treatment settings. Citation Format: Adel Zaid I Mutahar, Banita Verma, Stavros Melemenidis, Suparna Dutt, Kerriann M. Casey, Zhen Qi, Angera Hsiao-Chi Kuo, Kathleen C. Horst, Edward Elliot Graves, Michael F. Clarke, Billy W. Loo, Frederick M. Dirbas. FLASH radiotherapy maintains tumor control and enables safe re-irradiation while preserving normal tissue in breast cancer PDX models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5266.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US), Palo Alto University (US), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.