Abstract 5111: The global inequality in cervical cancer screening: An evidence synthesis

Abstract Background: The rising global burden of cervical cancer and persistent inequalities in screening access underscore the need to strengthen implementation. Therefore, we compiled the cervical cancer screening guidelines from different countries/regions and evaluated their implementation status and coverage situation. Methods: In this study, we conducted comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases (from their establishment to February 1, 2025), websites and the World Health Organization (WHO) database. Studies included in our analysis provide detailed information on the official cervical cancer screening recommendations for each country. All indicators were stratified based on factors such as human development index (HDI), income level, geographical location, WHO regions, disease risk, and age. The systematic review was prospectively registered at Prospero (registration number: CRD420251087263). Results: Our study incorporated data from 77 countries/regions, only 62.3% (48/77) of them provided the year of published/updated protocol. Cytology was the primary screening test in 62 (80.5%) of 77 countries. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) was the most recommended test in low HDI countries. The number of countries using Human papillomavirus (HPV) is relatively small. Screening coverage was associated with HDI/income (low HDI: 12.43% vs very high HDI: 49.74%; high-income: 51.68% vs low income and middle-income countries [LMICs]:34.45%), with high-risk regions (29.88%) significantly lower than other areas (46.76%). Age-stratified analysis showed minimal coverage in the 20-29 and 70-79 groups, while coverage peaked in the 30-39 group. Our results also showed substantial heterogeneity in screening quality indicators (positive rate, further assessment rate, detection rate, and positive predictive value [PPV]). Conclusions: This study highlights global inequities in cervical cancer screening guidelines, particularly in the transition of screening methods among different countries/regions. Global cervical cancer coverage remains significantly below the target of 70%. Accelerate screening strategies, improve screening-diagnosis-treatment accessibility, establish monitoring systems, and strengthen global cooperation. Key words: Cervical cancer; Global health; Health policy;Screening, Coverage, Systematic review Citation Format: Ruijun Xin, Xiaomei Wu, Bo Zhu. The global inequality in cervical cancer screening: An evidence synthesis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5111.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-5111
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 5111: The global inequality in cervical cancer screening: An evidence synthesis

Bo Zhu, Ruijun Xin, Xiaomei Wu
Cancer Research
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Abstract 5111: The global inequality in cervical cancer screening: An evidence synthesis

Bo Zhu, Ruijun Xin, Xiaomei Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The rising global burden of cervical cancer and persistent inequalities in screening access underscore the need to strengthen implementation. Therefore, we compiled the cervical cancer screening guidelines from different countries/regions and evaluated their implementation status and coverage situation. Methods: In this study, we conducted comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases (from their establishment to February 1, 2025), websites and the World Health Organization (WHO) database. Studies included in our analysis provide detailed information on the official cervical cancer screening recommendations for each country. All indicators were stratified based on factors such as human development index (HDI), income level, geographical location, WHO regions, disease risk, and age. The systematic review was prospectively registered at Prospero (registration number: CRD420251087263). Results: Our study incorporated data from 77 countries/regions, only 62.3% (48/77) of them provided the year of published/updated protocol. Cytology was the primary screening test in 62 (80.5%) of 77 countries. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) was the most recommended test in low HDI countries. The number of countries using Human papillomavirus (HPV) is relatively small. Screening coverage was associated with HDI/income (low HDI: 12.43% vs very high HDI: 49.74%; high-income: 51.68% vs low income and middle-income countries [LMICs]:34.45%), with high-risk regions (29.88%) significantly lower than other areas (46.76%). Age-stratified analysis showed minimal coverage in the 20-29 and 70-79 groups, while coverage peaked in the 30-39 group. Our results also showed substantial heterogeneity in screening quality indicators (positive rate, further assessment rate, detection rate, and positive predictive value [PPV]). Conclusions: This study highlights global inequities in cervical cancer screening guidelines, particularly in the transition of screening methods among different countries/regions. Global cervical cancer coverage remains significantly below the target of 70%. Accelerate screening strategies, improve screening-diagnosis-treatment accessibility, establish monitoring systems, and strengthen global cooperation. Key words: Cervical cancer; Global health; Health policy;Screening, Coverage, Systematic review Citation Format: Ruijun Xin, Xiaomei Wu, Bo Zhu. The global inequality in cervical cancer screening: An evidence synthesis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5111.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN), China Medical University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.