Randomized, double-blind study of zervimesine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease

In addition to ADAS-Cog11, outcomes were evaluated from baseline plasma p-tau217 in prespecified subgroups.ResultsOf 153 adults randomized, 150 were included in the mITT population. Adverse events occurred in 70.6% with zervimesine 100 mg, 82.4% with zervimesine 300 mg, and 78.0% with placebo. At Day 182, the ADAS-Cog 11 increased from baseline (indicating a decline in cognitive function) with the LS mean (SE) change of 2.69 (0.81) points in the placebo group versus 1.66 (0.60) points in the pooled zervimesine group [δ = -1.03 (-3.01, 0.96), p = 0.310]. For participants with baseline plasma p-tau217 levels below the median (1.0 pg/mL), the pooled zervimesine group showed greater improvement on the ADAS-Cog 11 at Day 182 relative to placebo (δ = -2.66; p = 0.080).ConclusionsThis phase 2 study indicated that zervimesine was safe and well tolerated and showed consistently favorable numerical treatment differences versus placebo. More robust treatment differences were observed in the below median baseline plasma p-tau217 group suggesting potentially greater efficacy of zervimesine in less advanced AD. These results support larger pivotal trials with zervimesine.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03507790.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261437145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized, double-blind study of zervimesine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease

Mary E. Hamby, Jennifer F. Iaci, Theresa Devins, Susan M. Catalano et al.
1 citations
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
12.01
article

Randomized, double-blind study of zervimesine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease

Mary E. Hamby, Jennifer F. Iaci, Theresa Devins, Susan M. Catalano, Everard G.B. Vijverberg, Roger Morgan, Douglas W. Scharre, Michael Woodward, Anthony O. Caggiano, Michael Grundman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In addition to ADAS-Cog11, outcomes were evaluated from baseline plasma p-tau217 in prespecified subgroups.ResultsOf 153 adults randomized, 150 were included in the mITT population. Adverse events occurred in 70.6% with zervimesine 100 mg, 82.4% with zervimesine 300 mg, and 78.0% with placebo. At Day 182, the ADAS-Cog 11 increased from baseline (indicating a decline in cognitive function) with the LS mean (SE) change of 2.69 (0.81) points in the placebo group versus 1.66 (0.60) points in the pooled zervimesine group [δ = -1.03 (-3.01, 0.96), p = 0.310]. For participants with baseline plasma p-tau217 levels below the median (1.0 pg/mL), the pooled zervimesine group showed greater improvement on the ADAS-Cog 11 at Day 182 relative to placebo (δ = -2.66; p = 0.080).ConclusionsThis phase 2 study indicated that zervimesine was safe and well tolerated and showed consistently favorable numerical treatment differences versus placebo. More robust treatment differences were observed in the below median baseline plasma p-tau217 group suggesting potentially greater efficacy of zervimesine in less advanced AD. These results support larger pivotal trials with zervimesine.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03507790.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), Office of the Chief Scientist (IL), M&I/Partners (NL), Dementia UK (GB), Cognition Therapeutics (United States) (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Medford Radiology Group (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
12.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.