Artifacts, Analogy, and Metaphor: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Studying the Evolution of Analogy

Analogy is central to human language and cognition. It has also been proposed to play an important role in language evolution. For these reasons, the evolution of analogy and the cognitive processes supporting it are an important explanatory target for evolutionary accounts of human language. We integrate data from comparative psychology and cognitive archaeology to investigate the evolution of analogy as well as its evolutionary foundations. We present evidence supporting the view that a number of capacities underlying analogy display evolutionary continuity between humans and nonhuman animals. In addition, we propose that analogical capacities can also be inferred from the archaeological record by looking at productional diversity in tool-making. To gain further insight into the evolution of complex human analogical capacities, we investigate comparative and archaeological evidence for one cognitive process intricately linked to complex forms of analogy and the evolution of language, that of metaphor. Overall, we propose an interdisciplinary framework for understanding the evolution of analogy and argue that analogy has deep evolutionary roots, supporting cognitive capacities such as metaphor and language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70203
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artifacts, Analogy, and Metaphor: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Studying the Evolution of Analogy

Elizabeth Qing Zhang, Michael Pleyer, Svetlana Kuleshova, Louis De Weyer et al.
Cognitive Science
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Artifacts, Analogy, and Metaphor: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Studying the Evolution of Analogy

Elizabeth Qing Zhang, Michael Pleyer, Svetlana Kuleshova, Louis De Weyer, Éric Boëda
article en

Abstract

Analogy is central to human language and cognition. It has also been proposed to play an important role in language evolution. For these reasons, the evolution of analogy and the cognitive processes supporting it are an important explanatory target for evolutionary accounts of human language. We integrate data from comparative psychology and cognitive archaeology to investigate the evolution of analogy as well as its evolutionary foundations. We present evidence supporting the view that a number of capacities underlying analogy display evolutionary continuity between humans and nonhuman animals. In addition, we propose that analogical capacities can also be inferred from the archaeological record by looking at productional diversity in tool-making. To gain further insight into the evolution of complex human analogical capacities, we investigate comparative and archaeological evidence for one cognitive process intricately linked to complex forms of analogy and the evolution of language, that of metaphor. Overall, we propose an interdisciplinary framework for understanding the evolution of analogy and argue that analogy has deep evolutionary roots, supporting cognitive capacities such as metaphor and language.

Cognitive ScienceVol. 50(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Wuhan Technology and Business University (CN), Archéologies et Sciences de l’Antiquité (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.