Does Orthography Mitigate the Impact of Background Noise on Word Learning?

= 4.41; 65 female). They were taught 16 novel words online across three training blocks that included repetition and picture naming. Orthography was manipulated between participants (present vs. absent), and background noise was manipulated within participants (quiet vs. noise). Learning was assessed through picture naming and spelling tasks before and after training. Noise impacted learning of word meanings, but not word forms (phonology and spelling) while orthography facilitated the learning of word forms but not word meanings. Further, there was greater orthographic facilitation for word phonology retrieval for words learned in noise suggesting that orthography may reduce the negative effects of noise on some aspects of word learning. This study demonstrated orthographic facilitation of word learning in a self-directed online learning paradigm with implications for naturalistic learning. Further, it suggested the need for further examination of orthography as a tool to reduce the negative impact of noise on word learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218261442538
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Orthography Mitigate the Impact of Background Noise on Word Learning?

Jessie Ricketts, Andrea Ophelia Salins, Courtney Hooton
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Does Orthography Mitigate the Impact of Background Noise on Word Learning?

Jessie Ricketts, Andrea Ophelia Salins, Courtney Hooton
article en

Abstract

= 4.41; 65 female). They were taught 16 novel words online across three training blocks that included repetition and picture naming. Orthography was manipulated between participants (present vs. absent), and background noise was manipulated within participants (quiet vs. noise). Learning was assessed through picture naming and spelling tasks before and after training. Noise impacted learning of word meanings, but not word forms (phonology and spelling) while orthography facilitated the learning of word forms but not word meanings. Further, there was greater orthographic facilitation for word phonology retrieval for words learned in noise suggesting that orthography may reduce the negative effects of noise on some aspects of word learning. This study demonstrated orthographic facilitation of word learning in a self-directed online learning paradigm with implications for naturalistic learning. Further, it suggested the need for further examination of orthography as a tool to reduce the negative impact of noise on word learning.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Australian Centre for Advanced Computing and Communications (Australia) (AU)
Australian Research Council, Royal Holloway, University of London
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.