Abstract 3835: The expression of Napsin A by immunohistochemistry in colorectal adenocarcinomas: An observational study

Abstract Background: Distinguishing primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma can be challenging in small biopsies, particularly when tumors are mucin-rich or poorly differentiated. Napsin A is widely used as a marker of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, yet scattered reports suggest it may sometimes be expressed in non-pulmonary primaries, including colorectal cancer. We set out to see how often napsin A is expressed in colorectal adenocarcinomas in our setting and to gauge how much of a diagnostic trap it may pose. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 107 colorectal adenocarcinoma samples using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Napsin A immunohistochemistry was performed using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Three pathologists independently reviewed the slides; napsin A was considered positive when granular cytoplasmic staining was present in at least 1% of tumor cells. For each case, we recorded tumor differentiation, histological subtype, and CDX2 status. Results: Of the 107 tumors, 83 (77.6%) were moderately differentiated, 18 (16.8%) poorly differentiated, and 6 (5.6%) well differentiated. Histological subtypes included not otherwise specified (84.1%), mucinous (6.5%), signet ring (6.5%), and a small number of other variants. All cases were CDX2 positive, supporting a colorectal origin. Napsin A staining was observed in only 1/107 cases (0.9%) of poorly differentiated signet-ring adenocarcinoma, confined to the monoclonal antibody; none showed positivity with the polyclonal antibody. Conclusion: In this series, napsin A expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma was uncommon but not absent. Thus, a napsin A-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma could still represent a colorectal primary, especially in unusual histological subtypes. Our findings support cautious use of napsin A, always alongside morphology, a broader immunohistochemical panel, clinical data, and, where possible, molecular work-up. A larger multicenter dataset would help clarify generalizability and whether specific colorectal carcinoma subtypes are more prone to napsin A expression. Citation Format: Cawekazi Cingo, Rahaba Marima, Tebogo Marutha, Zodwa Dlamini, Benny Mosoane. The expression of Napsin A by immunohistochemistry in colorectal adenocarcinomas: An observational study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3835.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-3835
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 3835: The expression of Napsin A by immunohistochemistry in colorectal adenocarcinomas: An observational study

Benny Mosoane, Rahaba Marima, Zodwa Dlamini, Tebogo Marutha et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
article

Abstract 3835: The expression of Napsin A by immunohistochemistry in colorectal adenocarcinomas: An observational study

Benny Mosoane, Rahaba Marima, Zodwa Dlamini, Tebogo Marutha, Cawekazi Cingo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Distinguishing primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma can be challenging in small biopsies, particularly when tumors are mucin-rich or poorly differentiated. Napsin A is widely used as a marker of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, yet scattered reports suggest it may sometimes be expressed in non-pulmonary primaries, including colorectal cancer. We set out to see how often napsin A is expressed in colorectal adenocarcinomas in our setting and to gauge how much of a diagnostic trap it may pose. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 107 colorectal adenocarcinoma samples using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Napsin A immunohistochemistry was performed using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Three pathologists independently reviewed the slides; napsin A was considered positive when granular cytoplasmic staining was present in at least 1% of tumor cells. For each case, we recorded tumor differentiation, histological subtype, and CDX2 status. Results: Of the 107 tumors, 83 (77.6%) were moderately differentiated, 18 (16.8%) poorly differentiated, and 6 (5.6%) well differentiated. Histological subtypes included not otherwise specified (84.1%), mucinous (6.5%), signet ring (6.5%), and a small number of other variants. All cases were CDX2 positive, supporting a colorectal origin. Napsin A staining was observed in only 1/107 cases (0.9%) of poorly differentiated signet-ring adenocarcinoma, confined to the monoclonal antibody; none showed positivity with the polyclonal antibody. Conclusion: In this series, napsin A expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma was uncommon but not absent. Thus, a napsin A-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma could still represent a colorectal primary, especially in unusual histological subtypes. Our findings support cautious use of napsin A, always alongside morphology, a broader immunohistochemical panel, clinical data, and, where possible, molecular work-up. A larger multicenter dataset would help clarify generalizability and whether specific colorectal carcinoma subtypes are more prone to napsin A expression. Citation Format: Cawekazi Cingo, Rahaba Marima, Tebogo Marutha, Zodwa Dlamini, Benny Mosoane. The expression of Napsin A by immunohistochemistry in colorectal adenocarcinomas: An observational study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3835.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.