Abstract 5414: Clinical outcomes and treatment outcomes of stage IV large cell lung cancer based on two national database analysis.

Abstract Background: Large cell lung cancer (LCLC) is an uncommon neuroendocrine subtype of non-small cell lung cancer with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Evidence regarding survival patterns in stage IV LCLC, particularly across different treatment modalities, remains scarce. This study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes using two national cohorts. Methods: Patients with stage IV LCLC diagnosed between 2000 and 2021 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) 17 registries. Eligible cases were stage IV LCLC according to the 7th or 8th TNM classification; demographic, clinicopathologic, socioeconomic, and available molecular data were collected. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) across treatment groups: no treatment, chemotherapy, and combined surgery plus chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of CSS. In addition, publicly available data from the Korean National Health Insurance System (KNHIS) were analyzed to assess the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation on survival. Results: A total of 3,478 patients were included. In the SEER cohort, 3-year OS differed substantially by treatment modality: 2.2% with no treatment, 7.1% with chemotherapy, and 13.3% with surgery plus chemotherapy. Similar trends were observed for CSS. In multivariable analysis, age >65 years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.25], p<0.0001), male sex (HR 1.17[95% CI 1.09-1.26], p<0.0001), and low household income (HR 1.18[95% CI 1.08-1.30], p<0.0001) were independently associated with higher cancer-related mortality. Compared with chemotherapy alone, surgery combined with chemotherapy reduced mortality (HR 0.78[95% CI 0.70-0.87], p<0.0001). Among the KNHIS cohort, EGFR mutations were detected in 303 of 666 patients (45.5%); however, the presence of EGFR mutation did not confer a significant survival benefit among patients who received chemotherapy (HR 0.821 [95% CI 0.63-1.07], p=0.146). Conclusions: Despite the overall poor prognosis, treatment significantly influences outcomes in stage IV LCLC. Chemotherapy provides a clear survival benefit, and multimodal therapy that includes surgery offers the greatest improvement, potentially reflecting increased access to molecular testing and targeted therapy. Further investigation— including the potential benefits of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated disease, systematic evaluation of other actionable mutations, and ongoing studies of immunotherapy after platinum-based regimens— is needed to define optimal management strategies for this rare subtype. Citation Format: Wongi Woo, Seoin Kim, Jongwoo Kim, Vincent Lopez, Kirun Chohan, David Thota, Yeena Lee, Christian Wong, Amrut Savadkar, Yoonjin Cha, Duk Hwan Moon, Sungsoo Lee, Young Kwang Chae. Clinical outcomes and treatment outcomes of stage IV large cell lung cancer based on two national database analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5414.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-5414
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 5414: Clinical outcomes and treatment outcomes of stage IV large cell lung cancer based on two national database analysis.

Amrut Savadkar, Kirun Chohan, Wongi Woo, Seoin Kim et al.
Cancer Research
Lung Cancer Research Studies
article

Abstract 5414: Clinical outcomes and treatment outcomes of stage IV large cell lung cancer based on two national database analysis.

Amrut Savadkar, Kirun Chohan, Wongi Woo, Seoin Kim, David Thota, Young Kwang Chae, Sungsoo Lee, Christian Wong, Yoonjin Cha, Vincent Lopez, Jongwoo Kim, Yeena Lee, Duk Hwan Moon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Large cell lung cancer (LCLC) is an uncommon neuroendocrine subtype of non-small cell lung cancer with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Evidence regarding survival patterns in stage IV LCLC, particularly across different treatment modalities, remains scarce. This study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes using two national cohorts. Methods: Patients with stage IV LCLC diagnosed between 2000 and 2021 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) 17 registries. Eligible cases were stage IV LCLC according to the 7th or 8th TNM classification; demographic, clinicopathologic, socioeconomic, and available molecular data were collected. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) across treatment groups: no treatment, chemotherapy, and combined surgery plus chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of CSS. In addition, publicly available data from the Korean National Health Insurance System (KNHIS) were analyzed to assess the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation on survival. Results: A total of 3,478 patients were included. In the SEER cohort, 3-year OS differed substantially by treatment modality: 2.2% with no treatment, 7.1% with chemotherapy, and 13.3% with surgery plus chemotherapy. Similar trends were observed for CSS. In multivariable analysis, age >65 years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.25], p<0.0001), male sex (HR 1.17[95% CI 1.09-1.26], p<0.0001), and low household income (HR 1.18[95% CI 1.08-1.30], p<0.0001) were independently associated with higher cancer-related mortality. Compared with chemotherapy alone, surgery combined with chemotherapy reduced mortality (HR 0.78[95% CI 0.70-0.87], p<0.0001). Among the KNHIS cohort, EGFR mutations were detected in 303 of 666 patients (45.5%); however, the presence of EGFR mutation did not confer a significant survival benefit among patients who received chemotherapy (HR 0.821 [95% CI 0.63-1.07], p=0.146). Conclusions: Despite the overall poor prognosis, treatment significantly influences outcomes in stage IV LCLC. Chemotherapy provides a clear survival benefit, and multimodal therapy that includes surgery offers the greatest improvement, potentially reflecting increased access to molecular testing and targeted therapy. Further investigation— including the potential benefits of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated disease, systematic evaluation of other actionable mutations, and ongoing studies of immunotherapy after platinum-based regimens— is needed to define optimal management strategies for this rare subtype. Citation Format: Wongi Woo, Seoin Kim, Jongwoo Kim, Vincent Lopez, Kirun Chohan, David Thota, Yeena Lee, Christian Wong, Amrut Savadkar, Yoonjin Cha, Duk Hwan Moon, Sungsoo Lee, Young Kwang Chae. Clinical outcomes and treatment outcomes of stage IV large cell lung cancer based on two national database analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5414.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Northwestern University (US), Yonsei University (KR), Severance Hospital (KR), MetroWest Medical Center (US), St. Joseph Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Lung Cancer Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.