Can Hirsch index predict academic rank among full-time academic orthopaedic shoulder surgeons?

Background: Hirsch index (h-index) has emerged as a refined metric for research productivity, offering a better approximation of scholarly influence. The aim of this study was to assess whether h-index can predict academic rank among shoulder surgeons. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed for full-time academic shoulder surgeons affiliated with American Shoulder and Elbow-recognized shoulder and elbow surgery fellowship programs. Study variables for each surgeon were classified as bibliometric (h-index, m-index, total number of publications, total number of citations, I-10 index, and maximum number of citations from a single work) and demographic (gender, training factors). Outcomes included the academic rank of each surgeon. Results: 153 full-time academic shoulder surgeons were included. H-index, I-10 index, and the total number of publications and citations were all strongly correlated with academic rank, while maximum citations for a single work, m-index, and years as an attending were moderately correlated with academic rank. H-index most reliably demonstrated an association with increasing academic rank. The h-index thresholds for assistant professor, associate professor, professor, and endowed professor were found to be 12.5, 12.5, 19, and 32.5, respectively. Discussion: When evaluating candidates for academic promotion in shoulder surgery, h-index is a reliable tool to quantitatively assess research productivity and scholarly impact. Level of evidence: Survey Study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shoulder & Elbow
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732261434964
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Hirsch index predict academic rank among full-time academic orthopaedic shoulder surgeons?

Hadley Grundman, Kevin Heo, Victoria A. Conn, Michael B. Gottschalk et al.
Shoulder & Elbow
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Can Hirsch index predict academic rank among full-time academic orthopaedic shoulder surgeons?

Hadley Grundman, Kevin Heo, Victoria A. Conn, Michael B. Gottschalk, Sameer R. Khawaja, Krishna N. Chopra, Jaden Hardrick, Thomas Bradley Edwards, Maya Sinha
article en

Abstract

Background: Hirsch index (h-index) has emerged as a refined metric for research productivity, offering a better approximation of scholarly influence. The aim of this study was to assess whether h-index can predict academic rank among shoulder surgeons. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed for full-time academic shoulder surgeons affiliated with American Shoulder and Elbow-recognized shoulder and elbow surgery fellowship programs. Study variables for each surgeon were classified as bibliometric (h-index, m-index, total number of publications, total number of citations, I-10 index, and maximum number of citations from a single work) and demographic (gender, training factors). Outcomes included the academic rank of each surgeon. Results: 153 full-time academic shoulder surgeons were included. H-index, I-10 index, and the total number of publications and citations were all strongly correlated with academic rank, while maximum citations for a single work, m-index, and years as an attending were moderately correlated with academic rank. H-index most reliably demonstrated an association with increasing academic rank. The h-index thresholds for assistant professor, associate professor, professor, and endowed professor were found to be 12.5, 12.5, 19, and 32.5, respectively. Discussion: When evaluating candidates for academic promotion in shoulder surgery, h-index is a reliable tool to quantitatively assess research productivity and scholarly impact. Level of evidence: Survey Study.

Shoulder & Elbow
Teradata (United Kingdom) (GB), Emory University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Stryker
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.