Objectification, Desensitization, and Personification: Medical Student Strategies for Engaging with Donor Bodies in the Anatomy Lab

Background: Human dissection remains a cornerstone of anatomy education, providing students with an early and profound encounter with the dead. Beyond technical skill acquisition, students must navigate the challenge of engaging with donor bodies in ways that are respectful, professional, and emotionally sustainable. Given the formative role of dissection in professional identity formation, this study explored the strategies students adopt in interacting with donor bodies and the motivations guiding these choices. Methods: All medical students (M1-M4) at a single institution were invited to participate, and recruitment was closed after 44 students volunteered for either an interview or focus group. Of these, 24 joined focus groups and 20 completed individual semi-structured interviews. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using inductive coding. Results: Analysis revealed four main strategies employed by students: (1) complete objectification of the donor as a non-living entity; (2) active desensitization to facilitate dissection; (3) overwhelming personification that impeded both learning and technical performance; and (4) middle-ground approaches involving oscillation between desensitization and personification. Conclusion: These findings highlight the diversity of strategies medical students use to engage with donor bodies in the anatomy lab and underscore the importance of recognizing and supporting this variation to foster ethical, compassionate learning environments and professional identity formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205261438883
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectification, Desensitization, and Personification: Medical Student Strategies for Engaging with Donor Bodies in the Anatomy Lab

Homaira M. Azim, S. Henderson, Christian J. Faller, Evan W. Fairweather et al.
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Objectification, Desensitization, and Personification: Medical Student Strategies for Engaging with Donor Bodies in the Anatomy Lab

Homaira M. Azim, S. Henderson, Christian J. Faller, Evan W. Fairweather, Alec Y Luna, So Hyun Jeon
article en

Abstract

Background: Human dissection remains a cornerstone of anatomy education, providing students with an early and profound encounter with the dead. Beyond technical skill acquisition, students must navigate the challenge of engaging with donor bodies in ways that are respectful, professional, and emotionally sustainable. Given the formative role of dissection in professional identity formation, this study explored the strategies students adopt in interacting with donor bodies and the motivations guiding these choices. Methods: All medical students (M1-M4) at a single institution were invited to participate, and recruitment was closed after 44 students volunteered for either an interview or focus group. Of these, 24 joined focus groups and 20 completed individual semi-structured interviews. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using inductive coding. Results: Analysis revealed four main strategies employed by students: (1) complete objectification of the donor as a non-living entity; (2) active desensitization to facilitate dissection; (3) overwhelming personification that impeded both learning and technical performance; and (4) middle-ground approaches involving oscillation between desensitization and personification. Conclusion: These findings highlight the diversity of strategies medical students use to engage with donor bodies in the anatomy lab and underscore the importance of recognizing and supporting this variation to foster ethical, compassionate learning environments and professional identity formation.

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular DevelopmentVol. 13
International Baccalaureate (CH), Drexel University (US), Temple University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.