Optimized precision oncology through implementation of a comprehensive molecular analysis pipeline – relevance for additional therapeutic options

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Personalized medicine is guided by an expanding array of molecular targets. This study investigates whether larger next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels (> 1 Mb) yield more clinically relevant therapy options in molecular tumor boards (MTB) compared to smaller panels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 281 consecutive patients using a 430-gene DNA panel (1.3 Mb) combined with a RNA-fusion panel and compared the findings to a 185-gene DNA panel (618 kb). RESULTS: Molecular alterations were detected in 97.2 % of tumors with either oncogenic variants and/or gene fusions. Among these, 170 (60.5 %) received a molecular-stratified therapy recommendation from the local MTB. Only 8.8 % depended on the expanded 430-gene DNA panel, and additionally identified actionable variants in five additional genes. High TMB alone enabled 4.1 % of MTB recommendations. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that sufficient genomic coverage in DNA panels is essential for reliable TMB calculation, defining a minimal standard for genomic cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Genetics
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2026.04.001
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized precision oncology through implementation of a comprehensive molecular analysis pipeline – relevance for additional therapeutic options

Gernot G. U. Rohde, Marvin Görg, Akira Hattesohl, Niklas Gremke et al.
Cancer Genetics
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Optimized precision oncology through implementation of a comprehensive molecular analysis pipeline – relevance for additional therapeutic options

Gernot G. U. Rohde, Marvin Görg, Akira Hattesohl, Niklas Gremke, Fiona R. Rodepeter, Anja Rinke, Moritz Jesinghaus, Elisabeth Maurer, Charis Faoro, Elisabeth Mack, Cornelia Brendel, Christian Wilhelm, Ursula Keber, Christer Groeben, Jonas Schäfer, Marcel Romey, Andreas Burchert, Sebastian Adeberg, Thomas Wündisch, Uwe Wagner, Thomas M. Gress, Nadine Frickel, Christopher Nimsky, Jorge Ramon Riera, Jörg Hoffmann, Boris A. Stuck, Nuwar Harb, Julia Teply-Szymanski, Anne-Sophie Litmeyer, Detlef K. Bartsch, Florentin von Kügelgen, Steffen Ruchholtz, Martin Gschnell, Andreas Neubauer, Sonja Gehring, Lukas Frey, Albert Grass, Carsten Denkert
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Personalized medicine is guided by an expanding array of molecular targets. This study investigates whether larger next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panels (> 1 Mb) yield more clinically relevant therapy options in molecular tumor boards (MTB) compared to smaller panels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 281 consecutive patients using a 430-gene DNA panel (1.3 Mb) combined with a RNA-fusion panel and compared the findings to a 185-gene DNA panel (618 kb). RESULTS: Molecular alterations were detected in 97.2 % of tumors with either oncogenic variants and/or gene fusions. Among these, 170 (60.5 %) received a molecular-stratified therapy recommendation from the local MTB. Only 8.8 % depended on the expanded 430-gene DNA panel, and additionally identified actionable variants in five additional genes. High TMB alone enabled 4.1 % of MTB recommendations. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that sufficient genomic coverage in DNA panels is essential for reliable TMB calculation, defining a minimal standard for genomic cancer care.

Cancer GeneticsVol. 304-305
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), Wilhelm Stahl Provincial Hospital (ZA)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.