Abstract 1400: Addressing the EU IVDR challenge in targeted oncology trials.

Abstract The European Union (EU) In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR 2017/746) went into effect May 2022, dramatically changing the regulatory requirements for oncology clinical trials using an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) for patient enrollment. Sponsors developing experimental targeted oncology drugs are grappling with the new regulatory framework, which lacks alignment between drug and device regulations. This means sponsors may have to manage two parallel submissions and processes: a clinical trial for the drug and a separate performance study for the IVD used for patient selection, adding significant complexity, coordination, and potential delays. This poster outlines key considerations and best practices for drug sponsors managing these requirements. We explore preliminary options to avoid parallel studies—such as running the assay at a qualified Health Institution or utilizing a CE-marked assay—before detailing the necessary steps when a separate device study is unavoidable. The poster provides practical guidance for managing the dual studies that can be required under the new EU IVDR, focusing on two key areas. First, it addresses the critical decision of device sponsorship, clarifying the roles and responsibilities (including regulatory submissions, monitoring, and adverse event reporting) that must be defined between a drug sponsor and a device manufacturer in a partnership. Second, it highlights integrated oversight, outlining crucial areas for coordination where the two studies overlap, such as qualification of clinical trial sites, informed consent forms, shared study objectives, site personnel roles, and joint safety reporting responsibilities. The poster offers actionable insights and lessons learned to help oncology drug sponsors achieve clinical trial readiness in this new regulatory landscape. Citation Format: Margaret Curnutte, . Addressing the EU IVDR challenge in targeted oncology trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1400.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1400
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1400: Addressing the EU IVDR challenge in targeted oncology trials.

Margaret Curnutte
Cancer Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Abstract 1400: Addressing the EU IVDR challenge in targeted oncology trials.

Margaret Curnutte
article en

Abstract

Abstract The European Union (EU) In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR 2017/746) went into effect May 2022, dramatically changing the regulatory requirements for oncology clinical trials using an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) for patient enrollment. Sponsors developing experimental targeted oncology drugs are grappling with the new regulatory framework, which lacks alignment between drug and device regulations. This means sponsors may have to manage two parallel submissions and processes: a clinical trial for the drug and a separate performance study for the IVD used for patient selection, adding significant complexity, coordination, and potential delays. This poster outlines key considerations and best practices for drug sponsors managing these requirements. We explore preliminary options to avoid parallel studies—such as running the assay at a qualified Health Institution or utilizing a CE-marked assay—before detailing the necessary steps when a separate device study is unavoidable. The poster provides practical guidance for managing the dual studies that can be required under the new EU IVDR, focusing on two key areas. First, it addresses the critical decision of device sponsorship, clarifying the roles and responsibilities (including regulatory submissions, monitoring, and adverse event reporting) that must be defined between a drug sponsor and a device manufacturer in a partnership. Second, it highlights integrated oversight, outlining crucial areas for coordination where the two studies overlap, such as qualification of clinical trial sites, informed consent forms, shared study objectives, site personnel roles, and joint safety reporting responsibilities. The poster offers actionable insights and lessons learned to help oncology drug sponsors achieve clinical trial readiness in this new regulatory landscape. Citation Format: Margaret Curnutte, . Addressing the EU IVDR challenge in targeted oncology trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1400.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Precision for Medicine (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.