Abstract 2930: Unraveling determinants of drug response: PRISM viability profiling of hundreds of oncology therapeutics reveals mediators of selectivity and mechanism.

Abstract Incomplete understanding of drug mechanism, selectivity, and polypharmacology can contribute to failed clinical trials. Drug candidates are generally characterized with limited pre-clinical tools and a narrow indication focus based on expected target biology. Using approaches such as large-scale PRISM profiling of 900 cell lines that have been genomically profiled in the Dependency Map coupled with machine learning analysis can provide a more thorough and agnostic understanding of oncology drugs. Here, we demonstrate that systematic characterization of an Oncology Reference library of over 250 oncology drugs, encompassing biologics (e.g., cytokines, antibody-drug conjugates), targeted protein degraders, and small molecules, of which two-thirds have never been tested with large-scale cell line profiling, enables better understanding of on-target and off-target effects. We developed models to quantify selectivity, on-target activity, and polypharmacology. Surprisingly, in some instances, these measures of cellular specificity can anticipate differential outcomes in clinical trials. Among unexpected findings, we identified a recurrent viability signature predictive of compound lysosomal accumulation, a phenomenon associated with phospholipidosis. In addition, CDK4-selective inhibition emerged as a potential therapeutic vulnerability across a diverse range of cancer types, including CDK6-deficient or CDK4-altered cancer. Our findings establish the Oncology Reference dataset and PRISM as a benchmark for evaluating current and emerging cancer therapies: combining large-scale systematic cell line profiling, genomic characterization, and machine learning analysis enables comprehensive characterization of oncology drugs with potential to inform clinical development. Citation Format: Matthew G. Rees, Mustafa Kocak, Matthew J. Emmett, Colleen T. Harrington, Li Wang, Anthony Fazio, Alvin Kalathungal, Dennie T. Frederick, Aydin Golabi, Rachael Barry, Emily Reeves, John Davis, Melissa M. Ronan, Laura Doherty, Jillian N. Eskra, William R. Sellers, Jennifer A. Roth. Unraveling determinants of drug response: PRISM viability profiling of hundreds of oncology therapeutics reveals mediators of selectivity and mechanism [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2930.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2930
Primary Topic
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 2930: Unraveling determinants of drug response: PRISM viability profiling of hundreds of oncology therapeutics reveals mediators of selectivity and mechanism.

Colleen T. Harrington, Mustafa Kocak, Melissa M. Ronan, John F. Davis et al.
Cancer Research
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
article

Abstract 2930: Unraveling determinants of drug response: PRISM viability profiling of hundreds of oncology therapeutics reveals mediators of selectivity and mechanism.

Colleen T. Harrington, Mustafa Kocak, Melissa M. Ronan, John F. Davis, Aydin Golabi, Laura M. Doherty, Dennie T. Frederick, Matthew J. Emmett, Jillian N. Eskra, Rachael Barry, Emily Reeves, William R. Sellers, Matthew G. Rees, Alvin Kalathungal, Jennifer A. Roth, Anthony Fazio, Li Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Incomplete understanding of drug mechanism, selectivity, and polypharmacology can contribute to failed clinical trials. Drug candidates are generally characterized with limited pre-clinical tools and a narrow indication focus based on expected target biology. Using approaches such as large-scale PRISM profiling of 900 cell lines that have been genomically profiled in the Dependency Map coupled with machine learning analysis can provide a more thorough and agnostic understanding of oncology drugs. Here, we demonstrate that systematic characterization of an Oncology Reference library of over 250 oncology drugs, encompassing biologics (e.g., cytokines, antibody-drug conjugates), targeted protein degraders, and small molecules, of which two-thirds have never been tested with large-scale cell line profiling, enables better understanding of on-target and off-target effects. We developed models to quantify selectivity, on-target activity, and polypharmacology. Surprisingly, in some instances, these measures of cellular specificity can anticipate differential outcomes in clinical trials. Among unexpected findings, we identified a recurrent viability signature predictive of compound lysosomal accumulation, a phenomenon associated with phospholipidosis. In addition, CDK4-selective inhibition emerged as a potential therapeutic vulnerability across a diverse range of cancer types, including CDK6-deficient or CDK4-altered cancer. Our findings establish the Oncology Reference dataset and PRISM as a benchmark for evaluating current and emerging cancer therapies: combining large-scale systematic cell line profiling, genomic characterization, and machine learning analysis enables comprehensive characterization of oncology drugs with potential to inform clinical development. Citation Format: Matthew G. Rees, Mustafa Kocak, Matthew J. Emmett, Colleen T. Harrington, Li Wang, Anthony Fazio, Alvin Kalathungal, Dennie T. Frederick, Aydin Golabi, Rachael Barry, Emily Reeves, John Davis, Melissa M. Ronan, Laura Doherty, Jillian N. Eskra, William R. Sellers, Jennifer A. Roth. Unraveling determinants of drug response: PRISM viability profiling of hundreds of oncology therapeutics reveals mediators of selectivity and mechanism [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2930.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Broad Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.