A global typology for assessing socioeconomic impacts of the circular economy

Abstract Governments worldwide have embraced the circular economy and are translating it into policies, environmental laws, and regulations. However, the socioeconomic impacts of these policies are less understood due to a lack of systematic assessment. Here, we conduct a systematic review and analysis of 128 studies to develop a typology that identifies the most likely positive and negative socioeconomic impacts of different types of CE policies. The typology guides the development of more effective and balanced policies. We identified 12 key areas of impact and further divided them into 44 sub-topics. These areas cover how the circular economy affects industries, regions, and products, as well as describe effects on workers, employees, and communities. Most circular economy policies aim to transform waste into usable resources. The literature is practice-based, dominated by regulations and reporting, and financial incentives. Consumer products and plastics are in the spotlight. Employment is the most studied socioeconomic impact. Overall, the proposed typology can be used for any country, region or city to help policymakers and researchers better understand the socioeconomic impacts of circular economy policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Sustainability
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00038-6
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global typology for assessing socioeconomic impacts of the circular economy

Gillian Foster, Robert Marschinski, E. Langham, T. B. Fischer et al.
Communications Sustainability
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

A global typology for assessing socioeconomic impacts of the circular economy

Gillian Foster, Robert Marschinski, E. Langham, T. B. Fischer, T. King, M. Calisto Friant, B. Leiputė, S. Gaušas, A. Švedkauskienė
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governments worldwide have embraced the circular economy and are translating it into policies, environmental laws, and regulations. However, the socioeconomic impacts of these policies are less understood due to a lack of systematic assessment. Here, we conduct a systematic review and analysis of 128 studies to develop a typology that identifies the most likely positive and negative socioeconomic impacts of different types of CE policies. The typology guides the development of more effective and balanced policies. We identified 12 key areas of impact and further divided them into 44 sub-topics. These areas cover how the circular economy affects industries, regions, and products, as well as describe effects on workers, employees, and communities. Most circular economy policies aim to transform waste into usable resources. The literature is practice-based, dominated by regulations and reporting, and financial incentives. Consumer products and plastics are in the spotlight. Employment is the most studied socioeconomic impact. Overall, the proposed typology can be used for any country, region or city to help policymakers and researchers better understand the socioeconomic impacts of circular economy policies.

Communications SustainabilityVol. 1(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), North-West University (ZA), European Commission (BE), Joint Research Center (ES), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.