Social work involvement in advance care planning post US 2016 Medicare policy change: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Since 2016, the US Medicare programme has reimbursed physicians and advanced practice providers for advance care planning (ACP) discussions; however, social workers-who play a critical role in ACP-remain excluded from reimbursement. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence published since the 2016 policy change on three aspects of social workers' involvement in ACP: (1) extent of involvement, (2) attitudes and competencies and (3) effectiveness of social worker-led ACP interventions. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, SocINDEX and PubMed) were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and October 2025. 19 studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Findings were synthesised across five domains: social workers' ACP practices, knowledge, attitudes, roles and intervention effectiveness. Across studies, clinical social workers demonstrated strong knowledge of advance directives and reported high levels of confidence in facilitating ACP discussions. Most participants expressed positive attitudes towards ACP and viewed ACP facilitation as a core professional responsibility. Intervention studies suggested that social worker-led ACP initiatives may increase patient engagement in ACP, particularly completion of formal ACP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence highlights social workers' substantial contributions to ACP and suggests their potential effectiveness in improving ACP engagement. These findings support ongoing policy discussions regarding the inclusion of social workers in ACP reimbursement frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-006061
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social work involvement in advance care planning post US 2016 Medicare policy change: a systematic review

John G. Cagle, Kaipeng Wang, Jihyeong Jeong, Peiyuan Zhang
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Social work involvement in advance care planning post US 2016 Medicare policy change: a systematic review

John G. Cagle, Kaipeng Wang, Jihyeong Jeong, Peiyuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2016, the US Medicare programme has reimbursed physicians and advanced practice providers for advance care planning (ACP) discussions; however, social workers-who play a critical role in ACP-remain excluded from reimbursement. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence published since the 2016 policy change on three aspects of social workers' involvement in ACP: (1) extent of involvement, (2) attitudes and competencies and (3) effectiveness of social worker-led ACP interventions. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, SocINDEX and PubMed) were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and October 2025. 19 studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Findings were synthesised across five domains: social workers' ACP practices, knowledge, attitudes, roles and intervention effectiveness. Across studies, clinical social workers demonstrated strong knowledge of advance directives and reported high levels of confidence in facilitating ACP discussions. Most participants expressed positive attitudes towards ACP and viewed ACP facilitation as a core professional responsibility. Intervention studies suggested that social worker-led ACP initiatives may increase patient engagement in ACP, particularly completion of formal ACP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence highlights social workers' substantial contributions to ACP and suggests their potential effectiveness in improving ACP engagement. These findings support ongoing policy discussions regarding the inclusion of social workers in ACP reimbursement frameworks.

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Washington (US), University of Alabama System (US), Colorado State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.