Techno‐Economic‐Environmental Assessment of Pyrolysis‐Based Power Production From Methane

Methane pyrolysis enables low‐carbon power generation by converting natural gas into hydrogen and solid carbon without direct carbon dioxide formation. This study presents a comprehensive techno‐economic‐environmental assessment of an integrated pyrolysis‐based combined cycle (T‐cycle) and benchmarks its performance against a conventional natural gas combined cycle (C‐cycle). Thermodynamic modelling indicates that increasing pyrolysis temperature from 500°C to 1500°C enhances methane conversion (8% to 97%) and fuel LHV (51.73 to 115.3 MJ/kg) but reduces net power output (38.54 to 13.35 MW). At baseline conditions, the T‐cycle achieves an ≈54% reduction in specific CO 2 emissions compared with the C‐cycle, while the electricity selling price increases from $0.13/kWh to $0.35/kWh. Parametric analyses reveal that reactor pressure improves net power but suppresses methane conversion, highlighting a trade‐off between efficiency and decarbonisation. Economic results indicate that electricity price parity between the two systems can be achieved under moderate carbon pricing or through valorisation of solid carbon byproducts, with a required solid carbon price of ≈1023 $/tonne in the absence of a carbon tax. Overall, the results demonstrate the system‐level potential of methane pyrolysis as a strategic decarbonisation pathway for gas‐fired power generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202500405
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno‐Economic‐Environmental Assessment of Pyrolysis‐Based Power Production From Methane

Siva Krishna Karuturi, Muhammad Jalili Zarabadi
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

Techno‐Economic‐Environmental Assessment of Pyrolysis‐Based Power Production From Methane

Siva Krishna Karuturi, Muhammad Jalili Zarabadi
article en

Abstract

Methane pyrolysis enables low‐carbon power generation by converting natural gas into hydrogen and solid carbon without direct carbon dioxide formation. This study presents a comprehensive techno‐economic‐environmental assessment of an integrated pyrolysis‐based combined cycle (T‐cycle) and benchmarks its performance against a conventional natural gas combined cycle (C‐cycle). Thermodynamic modelling indicates that increasing pyrolysis temperature from 500°C to 1500°C enhances methane conversion (8% to 97%) and fuel LHV (51.73 to 115.3 MJ/kg) but reduces net power output (38.54 to 13.35 MW). At baseline conditions, the T‐cycle achieves an ≈54% reduction in specific CO 2 emissions compared with the C‐cycle, while the electricity selling price increases from $0.13/kWh to $0.35/kWh. Parametric analyses reveal that reactor pressure improves net power but suppresses methane conversion, highlighting a trade‐off between efficiency and decarbonisation. Economic results indicate that electricity price parity between the two systems can be achieved under moderate carbon pricing or through valorisation of solid carbon byproducts, with a required solid carbon price of ≈1023 $/tonne in the absence of a carbon tax. Overall, the results demonstrate the system‐level potential of methane pyrolysis as a strategic decarbonisation pathway for gas‐fired power generation.

Advanced Energy and Sustainability ResearchVol. 7(4)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.