Post-Catheter Ablation Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is a widely used rhythm-control strategy, yet its role in reducing thromboembolic risk and enabling oral anticoagulation (OAC) discontinuation remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively synthesize and evaluate randomized controlled trial evidence supporting long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating antithrombotic strategies after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. A frequentist network meta-analysis comparing reported treatment arms, along with a pooled incidence meta-analysis for outcomes of interest, was conducted. RESULTS: =0%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reinforces that, across randomized data, the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients who discontinued OAC after successful ablation remained low. However, the evaluation of net clinical benefit is limited by the low number of events across all treatment arms, underscoring the need for larger studies with prolonged follow-up to further validate the safety of this strategy, particularly in higher-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.125.014692
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Catheter Ablation Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Komandoor S. Srivathsan, Ricardo Estrada Mendizabal, Dravid Navale, Juan F. Rodriguez-Riascos et al.
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Post-Catheter Ablation Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Komandoor S. Srivathsan, Ricardo Estrada Mendizabal, Dravid Navale, Juan F. Rodriguez-Riascos, Luis R. Scott, Win-Kuang Shen, Aakash Somappa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is a widely used rhythm-control strategy, yet its role in reducing thromboembolic risk and enabling oral anticoagulation (OAC) discontinuation remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively synthesize and evaluate randomized controlled trial evidence supporting long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating antithrombotic strategies after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. A frequentist network meta-analysis comparing reported treatment arms, along with a pooled incidence meta-analysis for outcomes of interest, was conducted. RESULTS: =0%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reinforces that, across randomized data, the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients who discontinued OAC after successful ablation remained low. However, the evaluation of net clinical benefit is limited by the low number of events across all treatment arms, underscoring the need for larger studies with prolonged follow-up to further validate the safety of this strategy, particularly in higher-risk populations.

Circulation Arrhythmia and ElectrophysiologyVol. 19(4)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Elmhurst Hospital Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.