Adapting reactive case detection strategies for high-risk populations to increase malaria infection detection in Aceh Province, Indonesia

Reactive case detection (RACD), or testing and treatment of close contacts of recent malaria cases, is widely used in settings nearing malaria elimination, but often results in very low yield and uncertain impact. In areas where the primary vector exposure occurs outside the home, adapting RACD to target high-risk populations with specific exposure profiles may increase yield, surveillance value, and impact on treatment rates and transmission. We evaluated the feasibility and yield of a risk-based RACD approach based upon forest-based exposure, in comparison with the standard neighborhood and household-based RACD conducted in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Index malaria cases were enrolled from public health facilities in five subdistricts. For each index case, standard RACD included testing members of households within 500 m, while risk-based RACD involved testing non-household contacts sharing a forest worksite or forest travel. Infection prevalence was measured by light microscopy, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The study enrolled 47 index malaria cases during the study period, the majority (28) of which were diagnosed as P. knowlesi infections. Forty-one of the cases reported potential forest exposure outside the home, and follow-up was completed for 40 cases. Standard household-based RACD tested 847 household members from 34 index cases, yielding only 1 infection by LAMP/PCR (0.1%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.0 – 0.7%). Risk-based RACD tested 179 eligible contacts from 32 index cases, yielding 8 LAMP positive infections (4.5%; 95% CI 1.9 – 8.6%), including 3 confirmed by PCR (1.7%; 95% CI 0.3 – 4.8%). In Aceh Province, targeting RACD to non-household contacts with shared high-risk exposures substantially increased infection yield compared to household-based RACD. Risk-based, exposure-driven approaches may improve the effectiveness of RACD in settings where malaria risk is greater outside the home.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006154
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting reactive case detection strategies for high-risk populations to increase malaria infection detection in Aceh Province, Indonesia

Farah N. Coutrier, Lenny L. Ekawati, Carmen Cueto, Iska Zarlinda et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Malaria Research and Control
article

Adapting reactive case detection strategies for high-risk populations to increase malaria infection detection in Aceh Province, Indonesia

Farah N. Coutrier, Lenny L. Ekawati, Carmen Cueto, Iska Zarlinda, Michelle S. Hsiang, Martha G. Silaen, Rosa Lina, Jerry O. Jacobson, Jennifer K. Smith, Chris Cotter, Iqbal Elyazar, Adam Bennett, Rintis Noviyanti
article en

Abstract

Reactive case detection (RACD), or testing and treatment of close contacts of recent malaria cases, is widely used in settings nearing malaria elimination, but often results in very low yield and uncertain impact. In areas where the primary vector exposure occurs outside the home, adapting RACD to target high-risk populations with specific exposure profiles may increase yield, surveillance value, and impact on treatment rates and transmission. We evaluated the feasibility and yield of a risk-based RACD approach based upon forest-based exposure, in comparison with the standard neighborhood and household-based RACD conducted in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Index malaria cases were enrolled from public health facilities in five subdistricts. For each index case, standard RACD included testing members of households within 500 m, while risk-based RACD involved testing non-household contacts sharing a forest worksite or forest travel. Infection prevalence was measured by light microscopy, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The study enrolled 47 index malaria cases during the study period, the majority (28) of which were diagnosed as P. knowlesi infections. Forty-one of the cases reported potential forest exposure outside the home, and follow-up was completed for 40 cases. Standard household-based RACD tested 847 household members from 34 index cases, yielding only 1 infection by LAMP/PCR (0.1%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.0 – 0.7%). Risk-based RACD tested 179 eligible contacts from 32 index cases, yielding 8 LAMP positive infections (4.5%; 95% CI 1.9 – 8.6%), including 3 confirmed by PCR (1.7%; 95% CI 0.3 – 4.8%). In Aceh Province, targeting RACD to non-household contacts with shared high-risk exposures substantially increased infection yield compared to household-based RACD. Risk-based, exposure-driven approaches may improve the effectiveness of RACD in settings where malaria risk is greater outside the home.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(4)
Uppsala University (SE), University of California, San Francisco (US), Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology (ID), UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.