AI Governance Before Intelligence A Pre-Execution Substrate for Deterministic Refusal, Authority Validation, and Continuity Preservation Version 0.7.5 — Canonical

ABSTRACT — ELYON-SOL Modern software systems increasingly operate in environments where correctness alone is insufficient to ensure safe or valid outcomes. Systems may produce logically consistent and policy-compliant results while still entering states that cannot be legitimately resolved by users. This paper introduces Elyon-Sol, a governance-layer system architecture that enforces pre-execution eligibility constraints prior to policy evaluation and execution. Elyon-Sol formalizes a deterministic eligibility boundary based on four conditions: consent, authority, coverage, and presence. Requests that fail to satisfy these conditions are terminated before execution, preventing continuation into invalid or unresolvable states. This establishes a fail-closed model in which system behavior is governed by the existence of a legitimate path forward, rather than by post hoc validation or corrective handling. The architecture is positioned upstream of policy engines and execution layers, operating as a non-executing decision surface that evaluates whether action should be permitted at all. This separation distinguishes eligibility from policy and execution, ensuring that downstream systems are invoked only when preconditions are satisfied. The approach addresses a class of system failures characterized not by incorrect outputs, but by the persistence of interactions that lack valid resolution. The design is validated through real-world interaction case studies across healthcare, finance, and insurance domains, demonstrating consistent patterns of unresolvable system states and continuation without legitimate outcomes. Elyon-Sol prevents these conditions by enforcing deterministic refusal semantics, providing an auditable and reproducible mechanism for governing system behavior prior to action. This work contributes a system-level approach to software governance that prioritizes resolvability as a prerequisite for execution, offering a framework for designing systems that fail safely and terminate when legitimate completion is not possible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19409778
Primary Topic
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Governance Before Intelligence A Pre-Execution Substrate for Deterministic Refusal, Authority Validation, and Continuity Preservation Version 0.7.5 — Canonical

Justin LaPorte
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
article

AI Governance Before Intelligence A Pre-Execution Substrate for Deterministic Refusal, Authority Validation, and Continuity Preservation Version 0.7.5 — Canonical

Justin LaPorte
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT — ELYON-SOL Modern software systems increasingly operate in environments where correctness alone is insufficient to ensure safe or valid outcomes. Systems may produce logically consistent and policy-compliant results while still entering states that cannot be legitimately resolved by users. This paper introduces Elyon-Sol, a governance-layer system architecture that enforces pre-execution eligibility constraints prior to policy evaluation and execution. Elyon-Sol formalizes a deterministic eligibility boundary based on four conditions: consent, authority, coverage, and presence. Requests that fail to satisfy these conditions are terminated before execution, preventing continuation into invalid or unresolvable states. This establishes a fail-closed model in which system behavior is governed by the existence of a legitimate path forward, rather than by post hoc validation or corrective handling. The architecture is positioned upstream of policy engines and execution layers, operating as a non-executing decision surface that evaluates whether action should be permitted at all. This separation distinguishes eligibility from policy and execution, ensuring that downstream systems are invoked only when preconditions are satisfied. The approach addresses a class of system failures characterized not by incorrect outputs, but by the persistence of interactions that lack valid resolution. The design is validated through real-world interaction case studies across healthcare, finance, and insurance domains, demonstrating consistent patterns of unresolvable system states and continuation without legitimate outcomes. Elyon-Sol prevents these conditions by enforcing deterministic refusal semantics, providing an auditable and reproducible mechanism for governing system behavior prior to action. This work contributes a system-level approach to software governance that prioritizes resolvability as a prerequisite for execution, offering a framework for designing systems that fail safely and terminate when legitimate completion is not possible.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Governance Before Intelligence A Pre-Execution Substrate for Deterministic Refusal, Authority Validation, and Continuity Preservation Version 0.7.5 — Canonical — Justin LaPorte · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS