Assessing scientific thinking: Development and validation of a classroom test battery

Scientific thinking is a fundamental pillar of modern science education. However, ensuring the reliability and validity of various assessment tools is a challenging task. Therefore, this study developed, validated, and optimized a test battery for classroom use that evaluates three key dimensions of scientific thinking, namely scientific reasoning (SR), deductive reasoning (DR), and control of variables (CoV). Reliability and construct validity were determined using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Excellent internal consistency was determined for the revised and optimized versions of the test battery (α = .873 for SR, α = .912 for DR, and α = .767 for CoV). Furthermore, the CFA revealed a good model fit for the three optimized instruments, which was evidence of unidimensionality. This study offers educators, researchers, and policymakers a valuable resource to evaluate and improve scientific thinking in STEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102750
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing scientific thinking: Development and validation of a classroom test battery

Langat Gilbert Cheruiyot, Gyöngyvér Molnár
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Assessing scientific thinking: Development and validation of a classroom test battery

Langat Gilbert Cheruiyot, Gyöngyvér Molnár
article en

Abstract

Scientific thinking is a fundamental pillar of modern science education. However, ensuring the reliability and validity of various assessment tools is a challenging task. Therefore, this study developed, validated, and optimized a test battery for classroom use that evaluates three key dimensions of scientific thinking, namely scientific reasoning (SR), deductive reasoning (DR), and control of variables (CoV). Reliability and construct validity were determined using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Excellent internal consistency was determined for the revised and optimized versions of the test battery (α = .873 for SR, α = .912 for DR, and α = .767 for CoV). Furthermore, the CFA revealed a good model fit for the three optimized instruments, which was evidence of unidimensionality. This study offers educators, researchers, and policymakers a valuable resource to evaluate and improve scientific thinking in STEM.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
University of Szeged (HU)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.