Cost-effectiveness analyses of quadrivalent influenza vaccinations in the general European population – a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: Influenza infections affect around 20% of the population annually, generally causing a mild viral syndrome, but occasionally leading to severe complications or death. Influenza vaccines, with quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) as the newest generation, decrease the likelihood of infection and complications. Because both influenza infections and vaccinations impose costs on patients and on the broader society, the health gains of vaccination programs should be weighed against their financial impact. This review summarises the literature on cost-effectiveness analyses for quadrivalent influenza vaccinations compared with non-vaccination, in the general European population since 2012. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on cost-effectiveness analyses that compared quadrivalent influenza vaccination with non-vaccination. RESULTS: The eight included studies found that QIVs were cost-effective in 18/19 analyses at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 35 000 euro/QALY and in 15/19 analyses at 20 000 euro/QALY. Herd immunity was a major factor, as a large part of the observed cost-effectiveness gains occurred not in the targeted population for vaccination (children) but in the generations of their (grand)parents . CONCLUSIONS: effectiveness for each influenza season, and ethical considerations. These results may have been influenced by the clinical and epidemiological validity of the data used by the included studies and the limited number of included analyses, most of which were industry funded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Clinica Belgica
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2026.2652263
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness analyses of quadrivalent influenza vaccinations in the general European population – a systematic review

Dominique Vandijck, Bram Van Sassenbroeck, Maarten Roegies, Veerle Piessens
Acta Clinica Belgica
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Cost-effectiveness analyses of quadrivalent influenza vaccinations in the general European population – a systematic review

Dominique Vandijck, Bram Van Sassenbroeck, Maarten Roegies, Veerle Piessens
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Influenza infections affect around 20% of the population annually, generally causing a mild viral syndrome, but occasionally leading to severe complications or death. Influenza vaccines, with quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) as the newest generation, decrease the likelihood of infection and complications. Because both influenza infections and vaccinations impose costs on patients and on the broader society, the health gains of vaccination programs should be weighed against their financial impact. This review summarises the literature on cost-effectiveness analyses for quadrivalent influenza vaccinations compared with non-vaccination, in the general European population since 2012. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature on cost-effectiveness analyses that compared quadrivalent influenza vaccination with non-vaccination. RESULTS: The eight included studies found that QIVs were cost-effective in 18/19 analyses at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 35 000 euro/QALY and in 15/19 analyses at 20 000 euro/QALY. Herd immunity was a major factor, as a large part of the observed cost-effectiveness gains occurred not in the targeted population for vaccination (children) but in the generations of their (grand)parents . CONCLUSIONS: effectiveness for each influenza season, and ethical considerations. These results may have been influenced by the clinical and epidemiological validity of the data used by the included studies and the limited number of included analyses, most of which were industry funded.

Acta Clinica Belgica
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.