Abstract 604: Second site rescue mutants as tools to uncover reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants.

Abstract TP53 is an important tumor suppressor and is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. A large fraction of cancers with mutated p53 carry missense mutations, so they express full-length but nonfunctional p53. Therefore, reactivating mutated p53 to a wildtype-like conformation has long been a major therapeutic goal. However, the mechanisms underlying p53 reactivation are still poorly understood. To dissect this mechanism, this study employs a genetic strategy in which a second amino acid is mutated in addition to the G245S mutation found in cancer. This second mutation induces structural changes to compensate for the defect caused by p53 cancer mutations. Two second site rescue mutations were used in this study: N239Y, known to stabilize p53, and T123P, located within the transient L1/S3 pocket implicated in small molecule binding. When expressed alongside the cancer mutation G245S, both second site rescue mutations restored tumor suppressive properties, including suppressed growth, activated canonical p53 downstream targets, and restored DNA binding both in vitro and in cells. Differential scanning fluorimetry confirmed that N239Y increased folding stability of the G245S mutant. However, despite rescuing p53 activity, T123P further destabilized the structural stability of the G245S mutant. These findings demonstrate that p53 reactivation can occur through distinct and mechanistically divergent pathways, including those independent of global thermostabilization.Our results provide a genetic framework to classify reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants and define gene-expression signatures associated with each mechanism. Rather than being a direct treatment, this framework can help guide the identification and development of future small molecule p53 reactivators. Citation Format: Fiona Law, Zane Norman, Mark Villamil, Peter Kaiser. Second site rescue mutants as tools to uncover reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 604.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-604
Primary Topic
Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 604: Second site rescue mutants as tools to uncover reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants.

Fiona V. Law, Mark A. Villamil, Peter Kaiser, Zane Norman
Cancer Research
Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
article

Abstract 604: Second site rescue mutants as tools to uncover reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants.

Fiona V. Law, Mark A. Villamil, Peter Kaiser, Zane Norman
article en

Abstract

Abstract TP53 is an important tumor suppressor and is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. A large fraction of cancers with mutated p53 carry missense mutations, so they express full-length but nonfunctional p53. Therefore, reactivating mutated p53 to a wildtype-like conformation has long been a major therapeutic goal. However, the mechanisms underlying p53 reactivation are still poorly understood. To dissect this mechanism, this study employs a genetic strategy in which a second amino acid is mutated in addition to the G245S mutation found in cancer. This second mutation induces structural changes to compensate for the defect caused by p53 cancer mutations. Two second site rescue mutations were used in this study: N239Y, known to stabilize p53, and T123P, located within the transient L1/S3 pocket implicated in small molecule binding. When expressed alongside the cancer mutation G245S, both second site rescue mutations restored tumor suppressive properties, including suppressed growth, activated canonical p53 downstream targets, and restored DNA binding both in vitro and in cells. Differential scanning fluorimetry confirmed that N239Y increased folding stability of the G245S mutant. However, despite rescuing p53 activity, T123P further destabilized the structural stability of the G245S mutant. These findings demonstrate that p53 reactivation can occur through distinct and mechanistically divergent pathways, including those independent of global thermostabilization.Our results provide a genetic framework to classify reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants and define gene-expression signatures associated with each mechanism. Rather than being a direct treatment, this framework can help guide the identification and development of future small molecule p53 reactivators. Citation Format: Fiona Law, Zane Norman, Mark Villamil, Peter Kaiser. Second site rescue mutants as tools to uncover reactivation mechanisms of p53 cancer mutants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 604.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
UC Irvine Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.