Comparison of Phoenix Sepsis Score and traditional scoring systems in predicting mortality in PICU patients with suspected infection

Sepsis is a major contributor to mortality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Timely and accurate risk stratification in children with sepsis is essential to guide clinical management. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the ability of the Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS), Phoenix-8 score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score, Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA), Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) score to predict in-hospital mortality among PICU patients with suspected infection in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a prospective, single-center cohort study of children admitted to the PICU with suspected infection. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We assessed scoring system discrimination by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and evaluated calibration using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Among 519 eligible children, 32 in-hospital deaths occurred (6.2%). The median time to death was 4 days (IQR, 1–9). For mortality prediction, the AUCs were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95) for PSS, 0.89 (95% CI,0.82–0.95) for Phoenix-8, 0.73 (95% CI,0.63 –0.83) for SIRS, 0.87 (95% CI,0.79–0.94) for pSOFA, 0.90 (95% CI,0.85–0.96) for PELOD-2, and 0.89 (95% CI,0.82–0.97) for PRISM III. PSS exceeded SIRS and was comparable to pSOFA for in-hospital mortality prediction, while Phoenix-8, PELOD-2, and PRISM III showed higher AUCs. For the combined outcome of early death (within 72 h of PICU admission) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, PSS showed similar performance to pSOFA, Phoenix-8, and PELOD-2. No significant miscalibration was observed across scoring systems. PSS demonstrated good discriminatory ability in identifying high-risk patients for mortality in the context of low- and middle-income countries. It is suitable for the early identification of adverse outcomes in PICU patients with infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47381-1
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Phoenix Sepsis Score and traditional scoring systems in predicting mortality in PICU patients with suspected infection

Jingjing Xu, Yufeng Liang, D. Xing, Baiming Liu et al.
Scientific Reports
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparison of Phoenix Sepsis Score and traditional scoring systems in predicting mortality in PICU patients with suspected infection

Jingjing Xu, Yufeng Liang, D. Xing, Baiming Liu, Zijing Xiao
article en

Abstract

Sepsis is a major contributor to mortality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Timely and accurate risk stratification in children with sepsis is essential to guide clinical management. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the ability of the Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS), Phoenix-8 score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score, Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA), Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III) score to predict in-hospital mortality among PICU patients with suspected infection in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a prospective, single-center cohort study of children admitted to the PICU with suspected infection. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We assessed scoring system discrimination by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and evaluated calibration using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Among 519 eligible children, 32 in-hospital deaths occurred (6.2%). The median time to death was 4 days (IQR, 1–9). For mortality prediction, the AUCs were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95) for PSS, 0.89 (95% CI,0.82–0.95) for Phoenix-8, 0.73 (95% CI,0.63 –0.83) for SIRS, 0.87 (95% CI,0.79–0.94) for pSOFA, 0.90 (95% CI,0.85–0.96) for PELOD-2, and 0.89 (95% CI,0.82–0.97) for PRISM III. PSS exceeded SIRS and was comparable to pSOFA for in-hospital mortality prediction, while Phoenix-8, PELOD-2, and PRISM III showed higher AUCs. For the combined outcome of early death (within 72 h of PICU admission) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, PSS showed similar performance to pSOFA, Phoenix-8, and PELOD-2. No significant miscalibration was observed across scoring systems. PSS demonstrated good discriminatory ability in identifying high-risk patients for mortality in the context of low- and middle-income countries. It is suitable for the early identification of adverse outcomes in PICU patients with infections.

Scientific Reports
Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.