Abstract 431: A new approach methodology (NAM) for specificity testing: ISTAND qualification of the membrane proteome array to evaluate off-target binding of MAb-based therapies.

Abstract Background: Scientifically validated New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) provide an opportunity to better predict drug safety in humans while also accelerating drug development and regulatory review. The FDA has established pathways to qualify NAMs as Drug Development Tools (DDTs) through various mechanisms that now include the Innovative Science and Technology Approaches for New Drugs (ISTAND) program. Methods: We developed the Membrane Proteome Array (MPA) platform for specificity testing of antibody-based therapeutics. The MPA assesses binding interactions across ∼6,000 membrane proteins, each individually expressed in their native structural configuration within live or unfixed cells. The screen uses high-throughput flow cytometry, allowing for quantitative and high-sensitivity detection, and any identified targets are validated by titration analysis. The MPA is being qualified as a novel DDT through FDA’s ISTAND program. Results: As part of our DDT qualification, we performed a comparison study of 35 antibody therapeutics evaluated for specificity using both our MPA and conventional tissue cross-reactivity (TCR) studies. We found that 17% of these drugs had an off-target that was not expected based on TCR results. Overall, the MPA and TCR results were consistent for only about half of the molecules tested. In numerous instances, TCR results were inconclusive based on technical variability, nonspecific or cytoplasmic staining, or false-positive staining. Such results highlight the difficulty of using TCR data for deciding actionable next steps. In contrast, off-targets from the MPA are de-risked by statistically quantifying relative affinity and binding levels, localizing binding to extracellular vs. intracellular epitopes, and determining tissue expression patterns in humans to assess the in vivo safety risk. Through the MPA qualification process, we have also quantified the sensitivity and reproducibility of the platform and implemented additional quality control procedures and data analyses. Conclusions: MPA data is already routinely used in regulatory applications for antibody-based biotherapeutics and may be used to replace or complement other cross-reactivity studies. The MPA is currently in the last stages of review for DDT qualification through FDA’s ISTAND program. Citation Format: Diana Norden, Jonathan T. Sullivan, Carmen Navia, Jonathan Richards, Alexander Hobby, Rachel Fong, Benjamin Doranz. A new approach methodology (NAM) for specificity testing: ISTAND qualification of the membrane proteome array to evaluate off-target binding of MAb-based therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 431.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-431
Primary Topic
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 431: A new approach methodology (NAM) for specificity testing: ISTAND qualification of the membrane proteome array to evaluate off-target binding of MAb-based therapies.

Carmen Navia, Rachel H. Fong, Diana M. Norden, Jonathan T. Sullivan et al.
Cancer Research
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
article

Abstract 431: A new approach methodology (NAM) for specificity testing: ISTAND qualification of the membrane proteome array to evaluate off-target binding of MAb-based therapies.

Carmen Navia, Rachel H. Fong, Diana M. Norden, Jonathan T. Sullivan, Alexander Hobby, Benjamin Doranz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Scientifically validated New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) provide an opportunity to better predict drug safety in humans while also accelerating drug development and regulatory review. The FDA has established pathways to qualify NAMs as Drug Development Tools (DDTs) through various mechanisms that now include the Innovative Science and Technology Approaches for New Drugs (ISTAND) program. Methods: We developed the Membrane Proteome Array (MPA) platform for specificity testing of antibody-based therapeutics. The MPA assesses binding interactions across ∼6,000 membrane proteins, each individually expressed in their native structural configuration within live or unfixed cells. The screen uses high-throughput flow cytometry, allowing for quantitative and high-sensitivity detection, and any identified targets are validated by titration analysis. The MPA is being qualified as a novel DDT through FDA’s ISTAND program. Results: As part of our DDT qualification, we performed a comparison study of 35 antibody therapeutics evaluated for specificity using both our MPA and conventional tissue cross-reactivity (TCR) studies. We found that 17% of these drugs had an off-target that was not expected based on TCR results. Overall, the MPA and TCR results were consistent for only about half of the molecules tested. In numerous instances, TCR results were inconclusive based on technical variability, nonspecific or cytoplasmic staining, or false-positive staining. Such results highlight the difficulty of using TCR data for deciding actionable next steps. In contrast, off-targets from the MPA are de-risked by statistically quantifying relative affinity and binding levels, localizing binding to extracellular vs. intracellular epitopes, and determining tissue expression patterns in humans to assess the in vivo safety risk. Through the MPA qualification process, we have also quantified the sensitivity and reproducibility of the platform and implemented additional quality control procedures and data analyses. Conclusions: MPA data is already routinely used in regulatory applications for antibody-based biotherapeutics and may be used to replace or complement other cross-reactivity studies. The MPA is currently in the last stages of review for DDT qualification through FDA’s ISTAND program. Citation Format: Diana Norden, Jonathan T. Sullivan, Carmen Navia, Jonathan Richards, Alexander Hobby, Rachel Fong, Benjamin Doranz. A new approach methodology (NAM) for specificity testing: ISTAND qualification of the membrane proteome array to evaluate off-target binding of MAb-based therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 431.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Integral Molecular (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.