Abstract 6649: Comparative risk of secondary central nervous system metastases in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity-matched analysis of pembrolizumab vs atezolizumab monotherapy conducted on TriNetX.

Abstract Background: Bone and bone-marrow metastases significantly worsen morbidity in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Comparative real-world data assessing skeletal metastatic progression between pembrolizumab and atezolizumab monotherapy remain limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (69 HCOs). Stage IV mNSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy were identified. Propensity score matching (1:1) produced balanced cohorts (n=7,768 each). Outcomes were assessed over 365 days following treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was new-onset secondary bone/bone-marrow metastases (ICD-10 C79.51, C79.52, C79.5). Patients with prior skeletal metastases were excluded from outcome analyses. Results: Following exclusions, 5,277 atezolizumab and 5,780 pembrolizumab patients were analyzed. Atezolizumab was associated with a significantly higher incidence of bone/bone-marrow metastases compared with pembrolizumab (16.5% vs 10.8%; RR 1.53; 95% CI 1.39-1.68; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated reduced metastasis-free survival with atezolizumab (79.5% vs 86.8%, Log-Rank p<0.001). Hazard of metastatic progression was significantly higher with atezolizumab (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.46-1.80). Atezolizumab also demonstrated a greater mean number of metastatic instances (0.93 vs 0.55; p<0.001). Conclusions: In this large real-world matched cohort, atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with a significantly greater 1-year risk of secondary bone or bone-marrow metastases compared with pembrolizumab. These findings suggest clinically meaningful differences in skeletal metastatic progression between ICIs and warrant further prospective and mechanistic investigation. Citation Format: Umer Rizwan, Athar Nawab, Syed Najafi, Karandeep Bawa, Fnu Muhibullah, Christian Kaftanic, Sunanda Tah, Sabir Hussain. Comparative risk of secondary central nervous system metastases in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity-matched analysis of pembrolizumab vs atezolizumab monotherapy conducted on TriNetX [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6649.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-6649
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 6649: Comparative risk of secondary central nervous system metastases in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity-matched analysis of pembrolizumab vs atezolizumab monotherapy conducted on TriNetX.

Sabir Hussain, Athar Nawab, Sunanda Tah, Umer Rizwan et al.
Cancer Research
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Abstract 6649: Comparative risk of secondary central nervous system metastases in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity-matched analysis of pembrolizumab vs atezolizumab monotherapy conducted on TriNetX.

Sabir Hussain, Athar Nawab, Sunanda Tah, Umer Rizwan, Karandeep Bawa, Christian Kaftanic, Fnu Muhibullah, Syed Najafi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Bone and bone-marrow metastases significantly worsen morbidity in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Comparative real-world data assessing skeletal metastatic progression between pembrolizumab and atezolizumab monotherapy remain limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (69 HCOs). Stage IV mNSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy were identified. Propensity score matching (1:1) produced balanced cohorts (n=7,768 each). Outcomes were assessed over 365 days following treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was new-onset secondary bone/bone-marrow metastases (ICD-10 C79.51, C79.52, C79.5). Patients with prior skeletal metastases were excluded from outcome analyses. Results: Following exclusions, 5,277 atezolizumab and 5,780 pembrolizumab patients were analyzed. Atezolizumab was associated with a significantly higher incidence of bone/bone-marrow metastases compared with pembrolizumab (16.5% vs 10.8%; RR 1.53; 95% CI 1.39-1.68; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated reduced metastasis-free survival with atezolizumab (79.5% vs 86.8%, Log-Rank p<0.001). Hazard of metastatic progression was significantly higher with atezolizumab (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.46-1.80). Atezolizumab also demonstrated a greater mean number of metastatic instances (0.93 vs 0.55; p<0.001). Conclusions: In this large real-world matched cohort, atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with a significantly greater 1-year risk of secondary bone or bone-marrow metastases compared with pembrolizumab. These findings suggest clinically meaningful differences in skeletal metastatic progression between ICIs and warrant further prospective and mechanistic investigation. Citation Format: Umer Rizwan, Athar Nawab, Syed Najafi, Karandeep Bawa, Fnu Muhibullah, Christian Kaftanic, Sunanda Tah, Sabir Hussain. Comparative risk of secondary central nervous system metastases in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity-matched analysis of pembrolizumab vs atezolizumab monotherapy conducted on TriNetX [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6649.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine (US), Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital (US), Ark Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.