Characterizing Heterogeneity in Brain Morphology in Traumatic Brain Injury Using Normative Modeling

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is heterogeneous, complicating efforts to develop standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Conventional group-based analyses often obscure individual differences by averaging across diverse injury patterns. By contrast, by comparing deviation from the expected distribution observed in healthy controls, normative modeling can capture patient-specific deviations from expected neuroanatomical norms. The aim of this research was to use normative modeling to capture individual variability in brain morphometry on individuals who have experienced a TBI. METHODS: In this study, we applied traditional case-control and a normative modeling approach to cortical and subcortical MRI. Data were analyzed from the Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium Adult Moderate-to-Severe TBI working group. Primary outcome measures were cortical thickness and subcortical volumes, derived from the Destrieux and Freesurfer subcortical atlases. Case-control tests were conducted using linear models controlling for age, sex, site, and intracranial volume. Normative modeling was carried out by accessing the Predictive Clinical Neuroscience Portal, estimating individual deviations using a model of Bayesian linear regression with likelihood warping. RESULTS: < -2) in the same region, but every region experienced at least 1 extreme positive or negative deviation across individuals. Stratifying by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) severity sustained this pattern; even within GCS 13-15, GCS 9-12, and GCS 3-8 subgroups, regional convergence did not exceed 34%. The median number of deviations increased with injury severity (GCS 13-15 = 9, GCS 9-12 = 19, GCS 3-8 = 22), demonstrating that group averages mask highly individualized morphologic abnormalities as injury severity increases. DISCUSSION: Normative modeling detects participant-specific cortical and subcortical abnormalities that conventional group comparisons overlook, better representing the true diversity of TBI-related morphologic changes. Generating individualized "morphologic fingerprints" may ultimately advance prognostic accuracy and lay the foundation for personalized interventions in research and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214741
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing Heterogeneity in Brain Morphology in Traumatic Brain Injury Using Normative Modeling

Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Rachel Edelstein, Emily L. Dennis, Karen Caeyenberghs et al.
1 citations
Neurology
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
21.12
article

Characterizing Heterogeneity in Brain Morphology in Traumatic Brain Injury Using Normative Modeling

Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Rachel Edelstein, Emily L. Dennis, Karen Caeyenberghs, David F. Tate, Martin M. Monti, Abdalla Z. Mohamed, Evelyn Deutscher, Ekaterina Dobryakova, Torgeir Hellstrøm, William C. Walker, Frank Gerard Hillary, Sandy R. Shultz, Stefania Mondello, Houshang Amiri, John Darrell Van Horn, A. Olsen, Jennie L. Ponsford, Stuart J. McDonald, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Virginia Newcombe, Lars T. Westlye, Meng Law, Asta K. Håberg, Terence J. O'Brien, Erin D. Bigler, Elisabeth A. Wilde, Gershon Spitz, Jake Mitchell, Maheen M. Adamson, Andrei Irimia, David J. Sharp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is heterogeneous, complicating efforts to develop standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Conventional group-based analyses often obscure individual differences by averaging across diverse injury patterns. By contrast, by comparing deviation from the expected distribution observed in healthy controls, normative modeling can capture patient-specific deviations from expected neuroanatomical norms. The aim of this research was to use normative modeling to capture individual variability in brain morphometry on individuals who have experienced a TBI. METHODS: In this study, we applied traditional case-control and a normative modeling approach to cortical and subcortical MRI. Data were analyzed from the Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium Adult Moderate-to-Severe TBI working group. Primary outcome measures were cortical thickness and subcortical volumes, derived from the Destrieux and Freesurfer subcortical atlases. Case-control tests were conducted using linear models controlling for age, sex, site, and intracranial volume. Normative modeling was carried out by accessing the Predictive Clinical Neuroscience Portal, estimating individual deviations using a model of Bayesian linear regression with likelihood warping. RESULTS: < -2) in the same region, but every region experienced at least 1 extreme positive or negative deviation across individuals. Stratifying by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) severity sustained this pattern; even within GCS 13-15, GCS 9-12, and GCS 3-8 subgroups, regional convergence did not exceed 34%. The median number of deviations increased with injury severity (GCS 13-15 = 9, GCS 9-12 = 19, GCS 3-8 = 22), demonstrating that group averages mask highly individualized morphologic abnormalities as injury severity increases. DISCUSSION: Normative modeling detects participant-specific cortical and subcortical abnormalities that conventional group comparisons overlook, better representing the true diversity of TBI-related morphologic changes. Generating individualized "morphologic fingerprints" may ultimately advance prognostic accuracy and lay the foundation for personalized interventions in research and clinical practice.

NeurologyVol. 106(8)
University of Messina (IT), University of Southern California (US), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Pennsylvania State University (US), LAC+USC Medical Center (US), Deakin University (AU), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Al Ain University (AE), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), University of Utah (US), Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Cambridge (GB), Kessler Foundation (US), The Alfred Hospital (AU), University of Utah Hospital (US), Vancouver Island University (CA), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), Stanford Medicine (US), Alfred Health (AU), University of Virginia (US), Monash University (AU), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
21.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.