Long-Term Outcomes following Instability After Isolated Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for On-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions With <20% Glenoid Bone Loss

Background: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates are high after isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), especially among patients with off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) and significant glenoid bone loss. However, there are limited data on long-term recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following isolated ABR among patients with on-track HSLs and <20% glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and PROs after isolated ABR for on-track HSLs with <20% glenoid bone loss, a population where isolated ABR remains indicated. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: < .05. Results: = .01). Conclusion: Rates of recurrent anterior shoulder instability were high following isolated ABR for on-track HSLs with <20% glenoid bone loss and were associated with inferior PROs at mean 10-year follow-up. Younger age and collision athletics were associated with sustaining recurrent anterior shoulder instability, while increased glenoid bone loss was an independent predictor of undergoing revision stabilization surgery. There remains a clinical need for improved stratification of on-track HSLs to identify patients who may benefit from additional procedures to improve recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates and subjective outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261430742
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Outcomes following Instability After Isolated Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for On-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions With <20% Glenoid Bone Loss

Mark W. Rodosky, Shaquille Charles, Adam Popchak, Jonathan D. Hughes et al.
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Long-Term Outcomes following Instability After Isolated Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for On-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions With <20% Glenoid Bone Loss

Mark W. Rodosky, Shaquille Charles, Adam Popchak, Jonathan D. Hughes, Sahil Dadoo, R. Jun Lin, Neel Bhardwaj, Kyle E. Andrade-Bucknor, Tyler C. Williams, Ryan Gilbert, Albert Lin, Bryson P. Lesniak
article en

Abstract

Background: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates are high after isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), especially among patients with off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) and significant glenoid bone loss. However, there are limited data on long-term recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following isolated ABR among patients with on-track HSLs and <20% glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and PROs after isolated ABR for on-track HSLs with <20% glenoid bone loss, a population where isolated ABR remains indicated. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: < .05. Results: = .01). Conclusion: Rates of recurrent anterior shoulder instability were high following isolated ABR for on-track HSLs with <20% glenoid bone loss and were associated with inferior PROs at mean 10-year follow-up. Younger age and collision athletics were associated with sustaining recurrent anterior shoulder instability, while increased glenoid bone loss was an independent predictor of undergoing revision stabilization surgery. There remains a clinical need for improved stratification of on-track HSLs to identify patients who may benefit from additional procedures to improve recurrent anterior shoulder instability rates and subjective outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineVol. 14(4)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.