Aggregate productivity effect of labour and capital market distortions in Canada

Abstract How efficiently are workers, investment capital, and production distributed across firms in Canada? And how have they varied over time, across regions, and between sectors? To answer these questions, we present novel measures of the degree of resource misallocation over time and space using uniquely detailed firm‐level data (T2‐LEAP) between 2001 and 2015. We find the dispersion of marginal returns to both capital and labour across firms have increased significantly during this period, suggesting allocative efficiency is deteriorating. Using a rich but tractable multi‐sector model of heterogeneous firms, we find that had the misallocation of labour and capital not worsened over our period of analysis, aggregate Canadian productivity would be significantly higher. Worsening allocations between sectors alone accounts for approximately half of the widening productivity gap between Canada and the United States over this period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70047
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aggregate productivity effect of labour and capital market distortions in Canada

Trevor Tombe, Yu Chen
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Economic and Technological Innovation
article

Aggregate productivity effect of labour and capital market distortions in Canada

Trevor Tombe, Yu Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract How efficiently are workers, investment capital, and production distributed across firms in Canada? And how have they varied over time, across regions, and between sectors? To answer these questions, we present novel measures of the degree of resource misallocation over time and space using uniquely detailed firm‐level data (T2‐LEAP) between 2001 and 2015. We find the dispersion of marginal returns to both capital and labour across firms have increased significantly during this period, suggesting allocative efficiency is deteriorating. Using a rich but tractable multi‐sector model of heterogeneous firms, we find that had the misallocation of labour and capital not worsened over our period of analysis, aggregate Canadian productivity would be significantly higher. Worsening allocations between sectors alone accounts for approximately half of the widening productivity gap between Canada and the United States over this period.

Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
University of Calgary (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Economic and Technological Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.