“SP” (aka Standardized/Simulated Patient/Participant/Person)

The acronym "SP" is widely used in simulation-based education, yet its meaning varies across contexts, referring at different times to standardized patient, simulated patient, simulated participant, or simulated person. This commentary traces the historical evolution of SP terminology from Barrows and Abrahamson's "programmed patient" through contemporary usage reflected in the Healthcare Simulation Dictionary. Using literary and philosophical touchstones, we examine what is meant by standardized, simulated, participant, and person, and why these distinctions matter for fairness, assessment, psychological safety, and educational intent. The commentary highlights tensions between reproducibility and personhood, clarifies appropriate terminology for formative versus summative simulation contexts, and briefly considers questions posed by the emergence of AI-generated simulated participants. Greater intentionality and consistency in SP terminology across curricula, scholarship, and professional guidance may strengthen shared understanding and trust within the simulation community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000929
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“SP” (aka Standardized/Simulated Patient/Participant/Person)

Joanne Agnant, Sondra R. Zabar, Donna Phillips, Deepak Pradhan
Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

“SP” (aka Standardized/Simulated Patient/Participant/Person)

Joanne Agnant, Sondra R. Zabar, Donna Phillips, Deepak Pradhan
article en

Abstract

The acronym "SP" is widely used in simulation-based education, yet its meaning varies across contexts, referring at different times to standardized patient, simulated patient, simulated participant, or simulated person. This commentary traces the historical evolution of SP terminology from Barrows and Abrahamson's "programmed patient" through contemporary usage reflected in the Healthcare Simulation Dictionary. Using literary and philosophical touchstones, we examine what is meant by standardized, simulated, participant, and person, and why these distinctions matter for fairness, assessment, psychological safety, and educational intent. The commentary highlights tensions between reproducibility and personhood, clarifies appropriate terminology for formative versus summative simulation contexts, and briefly considers questions posed by the emergence of AI-generated simulated participants. Greater intentionality and consistency in SP terminology across curricula, scholarship, and professional guidance may strengthen shared understanding and trust within the simulation community.

Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Pediatrics and Genetics (US), Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates (US), New York University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“SP” (aka Standardized/Simulated Patient/Participant/Person) — Joanne Agnant, Sondra R. Zabar, et al. · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS