Evaluating the pain management among postoperative patients in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Background: Postoperative pain is one of the most common and distressing consequences of surgery, with inadequate pain management contributing to delayed recovery, increased morbidity, and reduced patient satisfaction. Despite advances in analgesic techniques, patients in many healthcare systems continue to report poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate pain management practices and patient satisfaction among postoperative patients in Saudi Arabia. Methods: < 0.05. Results: Of the 688 participants, 52.8% were female, and the majority (95.3%) were Saudi nationals. Most respondents were treated in government hospitals (63.5%) and underwent general (26.9%) or obstetric/gynecological surgery (19.5%). The mean postoperative pain score was 5.29 (SD: 2.94), with 76.2% reporting pain. Pain assessment was inconsistent; 39.4% reported being assessed using numeric scales, while an equal proportion indicated no assessment. The most common management methods were intravenous analgesics (52.2%) and oral medications (44.6%), with nonpharmacological approaches rarely used (1.5%). Overall satisfaction was moderate to high, with 78.8% reporting being satisfied or very satisfied. Conclusion: Postoperative pain remains prevalent and often under-assessed in Saudi Arabia. Although satisfaction levels were generally favorable, significant disparities exist across sex, age, and surgical type. Standardizing pain assessment tools and implementing tailored, multimodal management strategies could improve patient outcomes and overall satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_806_25
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the pain management among postoperative patients in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Miad Alhamrani, Mohammed Almarjan, Lama Alharbi, Rothana M. Aljehani et al.
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Evaluating the pain management among postoperative patients in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Miad Alhamrani, Mohammed Almarjan, Lama Alharbi, Rothana M. Aljehani, Yara Alorfi, Haneen Alharbi
article en

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain is one of the most common and distressing consequences of surgery, with inadequate pain management contributing to delayed recovery, increased morbidity, and reduced patient satisfaction. Despite advances in analgesic techniques, patients in many healthcare systems continue to report poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate pain management practices and patient satisfaction among postoperative patients in Saudi Arabia. Methods: < 0.05. Results: Of the 688 participants, 52.8% were female, and the majority (95.3%) were Saudi nationals. Most respondents were treated in government hospitals (63.5%) and underwent general (26.9%) or obstetric/gynecological surgery (19.5%). The mean postoperative pain score was 5.29 (SD: 2.94), with 76.2% reporting pain. Pain assessment was inconsistent; 39.4% reported being assessed using numeric scales, while an equal proportion indicated no assessment. The most common management methods were intravenous analgesics (52.2%) and oral medications (44.6%), with nonpharmacological approaches rarely used (1.5%). Overall satisfaction was moderate to high, with 78.8% reporting being satisfied or very satisfied. Conclusion: Postoperative pain remains prevalent and often under-assessed in Saudi Arabia. Although satisfaction levels were generally favorable, significant disparities exist across sex, age, and surgical type. Standardizing pain assessment tools and implementing tailored, multimodal management strategies could improve patient outcomes and overall satisfaction.

Saudi Journal of AnaesthesiaVol. 20(2)
University of Jeddah (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.