Three-Dimensional Distance and Coverage Mapping of the First Ray in Hallux Valgus

metatarsal, with 10% of each end defined to be in contact with the opposing bone. The nearest distance was calculated for this region, with regions of 5 mm or less defined as covered and >5 mm defined as uncovered. Sagittal TMT 1 angle was calculated as a marker of TMT instability. Welch's t-test and Mann-Whitney U were used for statistical analysis.ResultsHallux valgus patients demonstrated significantly increased coverage along the dorsal lateral and plantar lateral quadrant of the MTP joint relative to controls (28.59%, P=.002 and 14.47%, P=.007, respectively) and decreased coverage along the dorsal medial and plantar medial quadrant (-42.63%, P=.002 and -46.69%, P<.001, respectively). No differences in distance mapping at the MTP joint or contact and distance mapping at the TMT joint were observed between groups (Table 1). Sagittal TMT 1 angle was higher in the HV group (1.36° vs 0.6°, P=.02).DiscussionThere is notable discrepancy in coverage at the MTP joint in HV patients relative to those without HV, consistent with subluxation of the hallux MTP joint in HV. Contrary to our hypothesis, no discernable difference was noted at the TMT joint with respect to DM and CM. While sagittal plane angulation was higher in HV, it did not result in appreciable changes in contact and distance mapping at the TMT joint.Level of EvidenceIII: Retrospective case control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Specialist
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400261427165
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-Dimensional Distance and Coverage Mapping of the First Ray in Hallux Valgus

Sudheer C. Reddy, X. Li, Khue Tran, Qiuhong Ke
Foot & Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Three-Dimensional Distance and Coverage Mapping of the First Ray in Hallux Valgus

Sudheer C. Reddy, X. Li, Khue Tran, Qiuhong Ke
article en

Abstract

metatarsal, with 10% of each end defined to be in contact with the opposing bone. The nearest distance was calculated for this region, with regions of 5 mm or less defined as covered and >5 mm defined as uncovered. Sagittal TMT 1 angle was calculated as a marker of TMT instability. Welch's t-test and Mann-Whitney U were used for statistical analysis.ResultsHallux valgus patients demonstrated significantly increased coverage along the dorsal lateral and plantar lateral quadrant of the MTP joint relative to controls (28.59%, P=.002 and 14.47%, P=.007, respectively) and decreased coverage along the dorsal medial and plantar medial quadrant (-42.63%, P=.002 and -46.69%, P<.001, respectively). No differences in distance mapping at the MTP joint or contact and distance mapping at the TMT joint were observed between groups (Table 1). Sagittal TMT 1 angle was higher in the HV group (1.36° vs 0.6°, P=.02).DiscussionThere is notable discrepancy in coverage at the MTP joint in HV patients relative to those without HV, consistent with subluxation of the hallux MTP joint in HV. Contrary to our hypothesis, no discernable difference was noted at the TMT joint with respect to DM and CM. While sagittal plane angulation was higher in HV, it did not result in appreciable changes in contact and distance mapping at the TMT joint.Level of EvidenceIII: Retrospective case control.

Foot & Ankle Specialist
Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Medical Center (US), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.