Abstract 500: Co-occurrence of gene fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) defines a clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer.

Abstract Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a well-established biomarker in colorectal cancer. Gene fusions may also influence prognosis, but the clinical significance of their co-occurrence with MSI remains poorly understood. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of colorectal (N = 29,099) cancer patients, all profiled with Tempus AIs xT platform. Fishers tests assessed the enrichment of pathogenic and likely pathogenic gene fusions within microsatellite stability groups. Cox models evaluated the independent and interaction effects of MSI status and gene fusions on real-world overall survival from at biopsy collection, adjusting for age, stage, line of therapy, tumor purity, tumor mutation burden, and PD-L1 combined positive score. We tested for enrichment of all fusions, kinase fusions (NTRK1, NTRK3, RET, ALK, FGFR2, BRAF), and NTRK fusions (NTRK1, NTRK3). Results: The proportion of clinically relevant gene fusions was higher in MSI versus MSS colorectal cancer tumors (5.9% vs 1.8%): NTRK1 (2.2% vs. 0.048%), NTRK3 (1.2% vs. 0.14%), RET (0.87% vs. 0.096%), and TPM3 (1.0% vs. 0.0074%). Survival analyses revealed that all fusions and kinase fusions were both associated with significantly worse overall survival (Table 1). These trends persisted in sub-cohorts. MSI was associated with increased overall survival in models including all fusions, kinase fusions, and NTRK fusions. We did not detect a significant interaction between MSI and gene fusions across any of the models, likely due to smaller sample sizes. However, we confirmed fusions remained associated with poor overall survival when restricting to MSS tumors for all gene fusions and kinase fusions. Additional models fit to patients treated with specific therapies, such as immunotherapy, did not converge. Conclusion: Gene fusion rates differ between MSI and MSS colorectal tumors. While most fusions are generally associated with worse survival, this effect may be reversed in MSI cases. Citation Format: Scott Kulm, Sebastià Franch-Expósito, Paul Fields, Catherine Igartua. Co-occurrence of gene fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) defines a clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 500.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-500
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 500: Co-occurrence of gene fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) defines a clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer.

Catherine Igartua, Scott Kulm, P. A. Fields, S. Franch-Expósito
Cancer Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 500: Co-occurrence of gene fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) defines a clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer.

Catherine Igartua, Scott Kulm, P. A. Fields, S. Franch-Expósito
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a well-established biomarker in colorectal cancer. Gene fusions may also influence prognosis, but the clinical significance of their co-occurrence with MSI remains poorly understood. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of colorectal (N = 29,099) cancer patients, all profiled with Tempus AIs xT platform. Fishers tests assessed the enrichment of pathogenic and likely pathogenic gene fusions within microsatellite stability groups. Cox models evaluated the independent and interaction effects of MSI status and gene fusions on real-world overall survival from at biopsy collection, adjusting for age, stage, line of therapy, tumor purity, tumor mutation burden, and PD-L1 combined positive score. We tested for enrichment of all fusions, kinase fusions (NTRK1, NTRK3, RET, ALK, FGFR2, BRAF), and NTRK fusions (NTRK1, NTRK3). Results: The proportion of clinically relevant gene fusions was higher in MSI versus MSS colorectal cancer tumors (5.9% vs 1.8%): NTRK1 (2.2% vs. 0.048%), NTRK3 (1.2% vs. 0.14%), RET (0.87% vs. 0.096%), and TPM3 (1.0% vs. 0.0074%). Survival analyses revealed that all fusions and kinase fusions were both associated with significantly worse overall survival (Table 1). These trends persisted in sub-cohorts. MSI was associated with increased overall survival in models including all fusions, kinase fusions, and NTRK fusions. We did not detect a significant interaction between MSI and gene fusions across any of the models, likely due to smaller sample sizes. However, we confirmed fusions remained associated with poor overall survival when restricting to MSS tumors for all gene fusions and kinase fusions. Additional models fit to patients treated with specific therapies, such as immunotherapy, did not converge. Conclusion: Gene fusion rates differ between MSI and MSS colorectal tumors. While most fusions are generally associated with worse survival, this effect may be reversed in MSI cases. Citation Format: Scott Kulm, Sebastià Franch-Expósito, Paul Fields, Catherine Igartua. Co-occurrence of gene fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) defines a clinically distinct subtype of colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 500.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Tempus Labs (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.