Co‐Developing User‐Centred Nutrition Educational Resources to Integrate Nutrition Into Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Collaborative Approach With Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Consumers

INTRODUCTION: Nutrition is often overlooked in multiple sclerosis (MS) care, leading to a gap in comprehensive patient management. Developing MS-specific nutrition educational resources could address this gap. This study therefore aimed to collaboratively develop MS-specific nutrition educational resources with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and people living with MS (plwMS) to support the future integration of nutrition into MS care. METHODS: A three-phased qualitative study was conducted, guided by the Design Thinking framework. Phase 1 involved separate online workshops with HCPs and plwMS, alongside semi-structured interviews with HCPs, to explore needs and challenges related to nutrition in MS care, and to generate solution-focused ideas for resource development. Phase 2 focused on developing prototypes. Phase 3 included usability testing of the co-developed prototypes through online and face-to-face interviews with HCPs and plwMS. Data from Phases 1 and 3 were analysed using an inductive, reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two workshops (n = 9 HCPs; n = 14 plwMS) and ten HCP interviews were conducted in Phase 1, generating four themes: (1) Addressing healthcare barriers to providing nutrition education in MS care; (2) Supporting person-centred nutrition communication; (3) Fostering equity through accessible and inclusive MS-specific educational resources; and (4) The integral role of the dietitian in MS care. A set of new nutrition-resource prototypes, informed by Phase 1 theme-based design considerations, was co-developed and hosted on a website (Phase 2). In Phase 3, 18 HCPs and 15 plwMS provided feedback on the prototypes, grouped across four themes: (1) Clear, targeted messaging; (2) Visually and informative design; (3) Lived experiences; and (4) Trust, credibility and connection, suggesting that the design of user-centred educational resources can drive action, support decision-making and enhance user trust. These insights informed resource refinements for colour, language clarity, content relevance and navigation options to support their adoption into MS care. CONCLUSION: This study co-developed MS-specific nutrition educational resources to integrate nutrition into MS care. Future research should evaluate their applicability and effectiveness in real-world settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An MS consumer panel was consulted during the planning phase, and HCPs and plwMS contributed throughout the design process, including feedback on Phase 1 findings and prototypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70656
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐Developing User‐Centred Nutrition Educational Resources to Integrate Nutrition Into Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Collaborative Approach With Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Consumers

Karen Zoszak, Anita Stefoska‐Needham, Shoroog Allogmanny, Yasmine Probst
Health Expectations
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Co‐Developing User‐Centred Nutrition Educational Resources to Integrate Nutrition Into Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Collaborative Approach With Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Consumers

Karen Zoszak, Anita Stefoska‐Needham, Shoroog Allogmanny, Yasmine Probst
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nutrition is often overlooked in multiple sclerosis (MS) care, leading to a gap in comprehensive patient management. Developing MS-specific nutrition educational resources could address this gap. This study therefore aimed to collaboratively develop MS-specific nutrition educational resources with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and people living with MS (plwMS) to support the future integration of nutrition into MS care. METHODS: A three-phased qualitative study was conducted, guided by the Design Thinking framework. Phase 1 involved separate online workshops with HCPs and plwMS, alongside semi-structured interviews with HCPs, to explore needs and challenges related to nutrition in MS care, and to generate solution-focused ideas for resource development. Phase 2 focused on developing prototypes. Phase 3 included usability testing of the co-developed prototypes through online and face-to-face interviews with HCPs and plwMS. Data from Phases 1 and 3 were analysed using an inductive, reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two workshops (n = 9 HCPs; n = 14 plwMS) and ten HCP interviews were conducted in Phase 1, generating four themes: (1) Addressing healthcare barriers to providing nutrition education in MS care; (2) Supporting person-centred nutrition communication; (3) Fostering equity through accessible and inclusive MS-specific educational resources; and (4) The integral role of the dietitian in MS care. A set of new nutrition-resource prototypes, informed by Phase 1 theme-based design considerations, was co-developed and hosted on a website (Phase 2). In Phase 3, 18 HCPs and 15 plwMS provided feedback on the prototypes, grouped across four themes: (1) Clear, targeted messaging; (2) Visually and informative design; (3) Lived experiences; and (4) Trust, credibility and connection, suggesting that the design of user-centred educational resources can drive action, support decision-making and enhance user trust. These insights informed resource refinements for colour, language clarity, content relevance and navigation options to support their adoption into MS care. CONCLUSION: This study co-developed MS-specific nutrition educational resources to integrate nutrition into MS care. Future research should evaluate their applicability and effectiveness in real-world settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An MS consumer panel was consulted during the planning phase, and HCPs and plwMS contributed throughout the design process, including feedback on Phase 1 findings and prototypes.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(2)
University of Wollongong (AU), Taibah University (SA), UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of Wollongong
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.