How I Met My Partner: Online Dating and the Homogamy Gap Between Same‐Sex and Different‐Sex Couples

ABSTRACT Objective This study examines whether online dating helps explain differences in homogamy between same‐sex and different‐sex couples in the United States. Background Same‐sex couples tend to exhibit lower levels of homogamy than different‐sex couples, yet the mechanisms underlying these differences remain unclear. Online dating may either explain or suppress homogamy gaps by expanding access to diverse partner pools while simultaneously enabling selective filtering based on characteristics such as race, education, and age. Method Using data from the 2017 HCMST survey, this study estimates associations between partnership type, meeting partners online, and racial, educational, and age homogamy. Regression models are complemented by structural equation modeling to assess mediation and by interaction models to evaluate whether associations differ by partnership type. Results Same‐sex couples are more likely than different‐sex couples to have met their partners online and are less likely to be homogamous in race, education, and age. Online dating is associated with smaller age gaps for both same‐sex and different‐sex couples and suppresses the observed age homogamy gap between partnership types. In contrast, online dating does not meaningfully explain differences in racial or educational homogamy. Interaction analyses indicate that online dating is associated with higher racial heterogamy among same‐sex couples but not among different‐sex couples. Conclusion Online dating does not sufficiently explain homogamy gaps between same‐sex and different‐sex couples. Instead, structural constraints in partner markets and differences in partner selection processes likely play a more central role in shaping patterns of homogamy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.70072
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How I Met My Partner: Online Dating and the Homogamy Gap Between Same‐Sex and Different‐Sex Couples

Journal of Marriage and the Family
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

How I Met My Partner: Online Dating and the Homogamy Gap Between Same‐Sex and Different‐Sex Couples

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study examines whether online dating helps explain differences in homogamy between same‐sex and different‐sex couples in the United States. Background Same‐sex couples tend to exhibit lower levels of homogamy than different‐sex couples, yet the mechanisms underlying these differences remain unclear. Online dating may either explain or suppress homogamy gaps by expanding access to diverse partner pools while simultaneously enabling selective filtering based on characteristics such as race, education, and age. Method Using data from the 2017 HCMST survey, this study estimates associations between partnership type, meeting partners online, and racial, educational, and age homogamy. Regression models are complemented by structural equation modeling to assess mediation and by interaction models to evaluate whether associations differ by partnership type. Results Same‐sex couples are more likely than different‐sex couples to have met their partners online and are less likely to be homogamous in race, education, and age. Online dating is associated with smaller age gaps for both same‐sex and different‐sex couples and suppresses the observed age homogamy gap between partnership types. In contrast, online dating does not meaningfully explain differences in racial or educational homogamy. Interaction analyses indicate that online dating is associated with higher racial heterogamy among same‐sex couples but not among different‐sex couples. Conclusion Online dating does not sufficiently explain homogamy gaps between same‐sex and different‐sex couples. Instead, structural constraints in partner markets and differences in partner selection processes likely play a more central role in shaping patterns of homogamy.

Journal of Marriage and the Family
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.