The therapeutic relationship in in‐person, video call, and telephone psychotherapy sessions

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether and how patients' perceptions of working alliance, alliance ruptures, real relationship and affective reactions towards the therapist differ across in-person, videoconferencing and telephone psychotherapy sessions. METHOD: A total of 1175 adult patients undergoing various individual psychotherapies completed self-report measures following sessions conducted in-person (746 sessions), via video call (1037 sessions), or by telephone (149 sessions). Linear mixed models with marginal structural model (MSM) were employed. Interaction effects with age group, time-in-treatment and session frequency were also examined. RESULTS: Patients reported similar levels of alliance, real relationship, positive and negative affective reactions and occurrences of alliance ruptures and repairs in both in-person and video call sessions. However, levels of alliance dimensions-agreement on therapy goals, therapy tasks and affective bond-were significantly lower in telephone sessions compared to in-person (β = -.21 to -.25) and video call (β = -.34 to -.37) sessions. Positive affective reactions were also lower in telephone sessions compared to video call sessions (β = -.22). Age, time in treatment and session frequency significantly moderated some associations. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic relationship is comparable between in-person and video call sessions. Telephone sessions, however, are associated with lower working alliance and in-session positive affective reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70050
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The therapeutic relationship in in‐person, video call, and telephone psychotherapy sessions

Alberto Stefana, Teresa Fazia, Andrea Nova
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

The therapeutic relationship in in‐person, video call, and telephone psychotherapy sessions

Alberto Stefana, Teresa Fazia, Andrea Nova
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether and how patients' perceptions of working alliance, alliance ruptures, real relationship and affective reactions towards the therapist differ across in-person, videoconferencing and telephone psychotherapy sessions. METHOD: A total of 1175 adult patients undergoing various individual psychotherapies completed self-report measures following sessions conducted in-person (746 sessions), via video call (1037 sessions), or by telephone (149 sessions). Linear mixed models with marginal structural model (MSM) were employed. Interaction effects with age group, time-in-treatment and session frequency were also examined. RESULTS: Patients reported similar levels of alliance, real relationship, positive and negative affective reactions and occurrences of alliance ruptures and repairs in both in-person and video call sessions. However, levels of alliance dimensions-agreement on therapy goals, therapy tasks and affective bond-were significantly lower in telephone sessions compared to in-person (β = -.21 to -.25) and video call (β = -.34 to -.37) sessions. Positive affective reactions were also lower in telephone sessions compared to video call sessions (β = -.22). Age, time in treatment and session frequency significantly moderated some associations. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic relationship is comparable between in-person and video call sessions. Telephone sessions, however, are associated with lower working alliance and in-session positive affective reactions.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology
University of Pavia (IT), Ohio Department of Health (US), National Institute of Health (AM), Institute for Behavioral Medicine (US), The Ohio State University (US)
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.