A nationwide perspective on ergonomic gaps in spine surgery: modifiable risk factors and gender-based findings

Study Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Purpose: To determine the prevalence, anatomical distribution, and modifiable ergonomic risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among early-career spine surgeons in India, with an emphasis on gender-based differences. Overview of Literature: Although MSDs are a well-recognized occupational hazard for surgeons, a large portion of existing spine surgery literature originates from high-income countries, focuses on low back pain, and lacks targeted evaluation of early-career surgeons in low- and middle-income countries. Consequently, gender-specific ergonomic challenges remain underexplored. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted (January-June 2025) among spine surgeons with <10 years of independent practice experience. The questionnaire assessed the demographics, operative workload, ergonomic practices, equipment use, and MSD symptoms over the past 12 months. Associations were evaluated using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from multivariable exact logistic regression. Results: A total of 764 surgeons (mean age, 35.4±4.5 years; 19.6% women) participated. MSD prevalence was 83.9%, with 96.1% of symptomatic surgeons reporting neck discomfort. All women reported MSD, whereas only 80.0% of men did so (p<0.001). Microscope use was significantly associated with neck discomfort (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.14-2.39; p=0.009), whereas loupe use was not. Consistent table height adjustment was associated with markedly decreased MSD prevalence (72.8% vs. approximately 100%; aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.88; p=0.03). Only 6.7% of the respondents reported preoperative ergonomic planning, despite frequent assistant-surgeon height mismatch (63.8%). Conclusions: This nationwide survey of young spine surgeons in India revealed an unprecedented neck-dominant MSD pattern, universal MSD prevalence among female surgeons, and a strong protective effect of consistent table height adjustment. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted ergonomic training, visualization tool optimization, and integration of ergonomic planning into surgical workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Spine Journal
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0507
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A nationwide perspective on ergonomic gaps in spine surgery: modifiable risk factors and gender-based findings

Priyambada Kumar, Mehul Sarkar, Mithilesh Nikam
Asian Spine Journal
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

A nationwide perspective on ergonomic gaps in spine surgery: modifiable risk factors and gender-based findings

Priyambada Kumar, Mehul Sarkar, Mithilesh Nikam
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Purpose: To determine the prevalence, anatomical distribution, and modifiable ergonomic risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among early-career spine surgeons in India, with an emphasis on gender-based differences. Overview of Literature: Although MSDs are a well-recognized occupational hazard for surgeons, a large portion of existing spine surgery literature originates from high-income countries, focuses on low back pain, and lacks targeted evaluation of early-career surgeons in low- and middle-income countries. Consequently, gender-specific ergonomic challenges remain underexplored. Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted (January-June 2025) among spine surgeons with <10 years of independent practice experience. The questionnaire assessed the demographics, operative workload, ergonomic practices, equipment use, and MSD symptoms over the past 12 months. Associations were evaluated using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from multivariable exact logistic regression. Results: A total of 764 surgeons (mean age, 35.4±4.5 years; 19.6% women) participated. MSD prevalence was 83.9%, with 96.1% of symptomatic surgeons reporting neck discomfort. All women reported MSD, whereas only 80.0% of men did so (p<0.001). Microscope use was significantly associated with neck discomfort (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.14-2.39; p=0.009), whereas loupe use was not. Consistent table height adjustment was associated with markedly decreased MSD prevalence (72.8% vs. approximately 100%; aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.88; p=0.03). Only 6.7% of the respondents reported preoperative ergonomic planning, despite frequent assistant-surgeon height mismatch (63.8%). Conclusions: This nationwide survey of young spine surgeons in India revealed an unprecedented neck-dominant MSD pattern, universal MSD prevalence among female surgeons, and a strong protective effect of consistent table height adjustment. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted ergonomic training, visualization tool optimization, and integration of ergonomic planning into surgical workflows.

Asian Spine Journal
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.