Oscillations in Perceptual Accuracy: How Well Do People Perceive Parties’ Ideological Positions?

Abstract While citizens are sufficiently informed about parties’ ideological stances during elections, we know little about how the perceptual accuracy of party positions evolves beyond the election campaign period. We argue that, during election campaigns, when political information is more readily available, citizens perceive party positions more accurately, but this perceptual accuracy decreases outside of election time. Leveraging the as-if random variation in interview timing in the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems dataset across 21 established democracies and the panel data structure of the British Election Study Internet Panel, we show that perceptual accuracy declines post-election and increases during the pre-electoral campaign period. Additional analyses suggest that these fluctuations in accuracy are primarily due to individuals becoming less informed rather than updating their perceptions in response to new information. These findings have important implications for democratic representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-026-10134-x
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oscillations in Perceptual Accuracy: How Well Do People Perceive Parties’ Ideological Positions?

Semih Çakır, Oğuzhan Alkan, Ruth Dassonneville, Zeynep Somer-Topcu
Political Behavior
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Oscillations in Perceptual Accuracy: How Well Do People Perceive Parties’ Ideological Positions?

Semih Çakır, Oğuzhan Alkan, Ruth Dassonneville, Zeynep Somer-Topcu
article en

Abstract

Abstract While citizens are sufficiently informed about parties’ ideological stances during elections, we know little about how the perceptual accuracy of party positions evolves beyond the election campaign period. We argue that, during election campaigns, when political information is more readily available, citizens perceive party positions more accurately, but this perceptual accuracy decreases outside of election time. Leveraging the as-if random variation in interview timing in the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems dataset across 21 established democracies and the panel data structure of the British Election Study Internet Panel, we show that perceptual accuracy declines post-election and increases during the pre-electoral campaign period. Additional analyses suggest that these fluctuations in accuracy are primarily due to individuals becoming less informed rather than updating their perceptions in response to new information. These findings have important implications for democratic representation.

Political Behavior
University of Vienna (AT), University of Ottawa (CA), The University of Texas at Austin (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Aarhus Universitet, University of Pittsburgh, University of Essex, King's College London, University of Oxford, Universität Wien, Université de Montréal
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.