Abstract 715: Robust segmentation-free stain quality concordance metrics in the SpaceIQ™ multi-omic analysis platform.

Abstract Background: Spatial imaging outputs continue to grow in scale and complexity. While brightfield IHC and H&E remain the qualitative gold standard for antibody-based assessment, mIF offers quantitative protein measurement on a single slide. However, challenges such as non-specific binding, imaging artifacts, and variability across sites and operators limit confidence in mIF reproducibility. A quantitative, robust method is needed to assess concordance between IHC and mIF stains. Methods: Using a pan-cancer dataset with a 4-plex mIF panel and matched IHC sections from consecutive slides, we first co-registered images into a shared coordinate space with Valis, applying global rigid and non-rigid transformations from feature matches. IHC stain channels were isolated via stain-matrix-based deconvolution. A tissue mask was generated on the mIF image using Otsu thresholding and morphology operations and then projected onto the IHC slide.Tissue was divided into tiles whose size accounted for section-to-section distance, registration error, and biological variability. Within each tile, random windows were sampled to perform two tests: (1) identify whether the tile contains high stain intensity and (2) determine whether the corresponding IHC and mIF tiles exhibit statistically concordant staining. This approach yields both a DICE score for high-stain region overlap and a stain concordance metric capturing agreement across high- and low-stain regions. Tile-level results and heatmaps are visualized in SpaceIQ™. Results: Concordance between mIF and IHC varied substantially across markers, with CD8 showing the highest and FoxP3 the lowest agreement, a trend consistent across samples. Concordance heatmaps also revealed strong spatial effects, with some tissue regions highly concordant and others clearly discordant. Expert visual review matched these quantitative findings. Conclusions: This segmentation-free framework identifies substantial marker- and region-specific variation in concordance between mIF and IHC staining. Because the method is marker-agnostic and compensates for registration error and inter-section biological differences, it provides a generalized, quantitative approach for evaluating agreement between paired mIF and IHC slides across platforms. Citation Format: Brian Falkenstein, Raymond Yan, A. Burak Tosun, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Filippo Pullara. Robust segmentation-free stain quality concordance metrics in the SpaceIQ™ multi-omic analysis platform [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 715.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-715
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 715: Robust segmentation-free stain quality concordance metrics in the SpaceIQ™ multi-omic analysis platform.

Filippo Pullara, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Brian Falkenstein, Raymond Yan et al.
Cancer Research
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Abstract 715: Robust segmentation-free stain quality concordance metrics in the SpaceIQ™ multi-omic analysis platform.

Filippo Pullara, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Brian Falkenstein, Raymond Yan, A. Burak Tosun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Spatial imaging outputs continue to grow in scale and complexity. While brightfield IHC and H&E remain the qualitative gold standard for antibody-based assessment, mIF offers quantitative protein measurement on a single slide. However, challenges such as non-specific binding, imaging artifacts, and variability across sites and operators limit confidence in mIF reproducibility. A quantitative, robust method is needed to assess concordance between IHC and mIF stains. Methods: Using a pan-cancer dataset with a 4-plex mIF panel and matched IHC sections from consecutive slides, we first co-registered images into a shared coordinate space with Valis, applying global rigid and non-rigid transformations from feature matches. IHC stain channels were isolated via stain-matrix-based deconvolution. A tissue mask was generated on the mIF image using Otsu thresholding and morphology operations and then projected onto the IHC slide.Tissue was divided into tiles whose size accounted for section-to-section distance, registration error, and biological variability. Within each tile, random windows were sampled to perform two tests: (1) identify whether the tile contains high stain intensity and (2) determine whether the corresponding IHC and mIF tiles exhibit statistically concordant staining. This approach yields both a DICE score for high-stain region overlap and a stain concordance metric capturing agreement across high- and low-stain regions. Tile-level results and heatmaps are visualized in SpaceIQ™. Results: Concordance between mIF and IHC varied substantially across markers, with CD8 showing the highest and FoxP3 the lowest agreement, a trend consistent across samples. Concordance heatmaps also revealed strong spatial effects, with some tissue regions highly concordant and others clearly discordant. Expert visual review matched these quantitative findings. Conclusions: This segmentation-free framework identifies substantial marker- and region-specific variation in concordance between mIF and IHC staining. Because the method is marker-agnostic and compensates for registration error and inter-section biological differences, it provides a generalized, quantitative approach for evaluating agreement between paired mIF and IHC slides across platforms. Citation Format: Brian Falkenstein, Raymond Yan, A. Burak Tosun, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Filippo Pullara. Robust segmentation-free stain quality concordance metrics in the SpaceIQ™ multi-omic analysis platform [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 715.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Expro (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.